Now that 4.0 is out, I have started Rebasing and testing autoscale changes against master. Will checkin as soon as practical.
-Vijay V. > -----Original Message----- > From: Vijay Venkatachalam [mailto:vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 9:24 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: Integrating autoscale branch to master? > > Ok I will keep changes ready, and will merge once 4.0's news is declared. > > -Vijay V. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] > > Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 9:16 PM > > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Integrating autoscale branch to master? > > > > > > > > On 10/12/2012 05:38 PM, Vijay Venkatachalam wrote: > > >> I think we agreed that autoscale could be merged in after 4.0? > > > > > > True. > > > > > > I am assuming getting it now into master should not cause trouble for > "4.0". > > > > > > > Although I think you are right we might still be cherry-picking some > commits. > > Could you wait until 4.0 is really out of the door? I'm assuming this > > will be done somewhere mid next week. > > > > I just want to prevent some merging hell between master and 4.0 should > > it be required for some unforeseen reason. > > > > Wido > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] > > >> Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 9:00 PM > > >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > > >> Subject: Re: Integrating autoscale branch to master? > > >> > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> On 10/12/2012 05:09 PM, Vijay Venkatachalam wrote: > > >>> Hi, > > >>> > > >>> I have rebased autoscale branch against master and testing on a > > >>> private > > >> setup. > > >>> If all unit test cases work fine, the plan is to rebase once > > >>> again on Monday (15th October India Time) and get autoscale to > master. > > >>> > > >>> Any concerns/comments? > > >>> > > >> > > >> I can't talk about the stability of the code, but I think we agreed > > >> that autoscale could be merged in after 4.0? > > >> > > >> I'm not against it being merged in. > > >> > > >> Wido > > >> > > >>> I have asked Pranav for help and he has agreed to commit. > > >>> > > >>> Thanks, > > >>> Vijay V. > > >>>
