On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:59 PM, David Nalley <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Alex Huang <[email protected]> wrote: >> Sometime ago I suggested a process for doing this. Have we considered that >> process and decided it's not useful? I think that process is much easier to >> maintain than a list on the wiki. > > > This process is good to adopt going forward - the problem with it is > two fold, though: > > * Many of those bugs were fixed without knowledge that there would be > a 4.0.1 - and so many have 4.1.0 as their fix version. > * Many bugs have no targeted fixed version - or in some cases have > multiple which is even more confusing. > > I think there probably needs to be a more active triaging of bugs by > folks doing release management, and maybe some consensus about what > needs to go where. I am somewhat concerned about the person filing > bugs needing to make that initial determination of whether the fix > should be in x.x.+1 or x.+1.x, etc.
I've been neglecting this in master (i.e.: 4.1.0), which need to be fixed. I'll start watching and managing the 4.1.0 fix version. > Speaking of, I'll go look into tickets with no fix version set. > > --David >
