Hi, I'm on vmware. I've managed to recover from my crashed cloudstack so I can give another go to the 3.0.2->4.0 upgrade.
Regards Tamas Monos DDI +44(0)2034687012 Chief Technical Office +44(0)2034687000 Veber: The Hosting Specialists Fax +44(0)871 522 7057 http://www.veber.co.uk Follow us on Twitter: www.twitter.com/veberhost Follow us on Facebook: www.facebook.com/veberhost -----Original Message----- From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 28 November 2012 16:32 To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: CloudStack 3.0.2 with 4.0 systemVM template? I'm really not sure that anything has changed. Did you use KVM or Xen? With KVM at least, the systemvm.iso used is on the agent, something like /usr/lib64/cloud/common/vms/systemvm.iso On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 3:58 AM, Tamas Monos <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Thank you for the info. > The last thing I'm not sure about if I want to have a "new" console > proxy than shall I use the new systemVM template or just replace the > systemVM.iso file on the secondary storage? > > Regards > > Tamas Monos DDI > +44(0)2034687012 > Chief Technical Office > +44(0)2034687000 > Veber: The Hosting Specialists Fax +44(0)871 522 > 7057 > http://www.veber.co.uk > > Follow us on Twitter: www.twitter.com/veberhost Follow us on Facebook: > www.facebook.com/veberhost > > -----Original Message----- > From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 27 November 2012 23:38 > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: CloudStack 3.0.2 with 4.0 systemVM template? > > I don't believe there is a 4.0-specific system VM template. At least > the current 4.0 instructions still say to download the acton template > from feb 2012. > > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Tamas Monos <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > As I'm stuck with the 3.0.2->4.0 upgrade I've decided to drop 4.0 > > for now and stay with 3.0.2 in production. > > However the 4.0 console-proxy systemVM follows screen resolution > > changes in 4.0 but not in 3.0.2 which is a major issue of ours. > > > > Can anyone tell me whether using a 4.0 systemVM template with a > > 3.0.2 management server would resolve this issue? > > Is it the systemVM.iso file needs replacing or the systemVM template? > > > > > > Regards > > > > Tamas Monos DDI > > +44(0)2034687012 > > Chief Technical Office > > +44(0)2034687000 > > Veber: The Hosting Specialists Fax +44(0)871 522 > > 7057 > > http://www.veber.co.uk<http://www.veber.co.uk/> > > > > Follow us on Twitter: www.twitter.com/veberhost< > > http://www.twitter.com/veberhost> Follow us on Facebook: > > www.facebook.com/veberhost< http://www.facebook.com/veberhost> > > > > > >
