I also failed to properly read your original mailer where you state vApp and VMware style feature. I currently have a vCloud and yes those are very useful features.
-kd -----Original Message----- From: Kelceydamage@bbits (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 8:23 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-576) PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13510257#comment-13510257 ] Kelceydamage@bbits commented on CLOUDSTACK-576: ----------------------------------------------- Sorry, don't get me wrong, I do think a PaaS solution for S would be awesome. On the other note I brought up a feature request at CCC for vApp style containers, and application collections. I Think there are a lot of features that I would enjoy seeing in CS, as it evolves. I just wanted to make sure I voiced that it would be a shame if CS lost some flexibility as the cost of enabling it as more end-user friendly system. My comment about add-on layer, I was thinking about how CloudPortal et-al, fits onto CloudStack but yet its separate. I summary I am in favor of more automation, and better feature-set, I hope we can be careful in its implementation. KELCEY DAMAGE Infrastructure Systems Architect www.backbonetechnology.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- kel...@bbits.ca address: 55 East 7th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5T 1M4 tel: +1 604 713 8560 ext:114 fax: +1 604 605 0964 skype: kelcey.damage > PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-576 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-576 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: New Feature > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: API, AWSAPI > Reporter: Duncan Johnston-Watt > > Given the level of interest in CloudStack as a platform for private, hybrid > and public cloud one of the gaps is support for composite/multi-tier > application blueprints comparable to VMware vApp and CloudFormation templates > without necessarily slavishly following either of them. This is almost > certainly a new component. One that will leverage/enhance the API/AWSAPI > components amongst others. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
