Thanks Bill! We will take you up on the offer -- perhaps to contribute an example OpenShift blueprint (when we have a candidate impl).
Best, Alex On Dec 14, 2012 7:58 PM, "William DeCoste (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org> wrote: > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13532602#comment-13532602] > > William DeCoste commented on CLOUDSTACK-576: > -------------------------------------------- > > Hi all, > > Just want to point out that OpenShift depends on a properly configured > linux (Fedora, RHEL, potentially Ubuntu, etc) instances. The instance can > be bare metal or a VM. How those instances are created and managed is out > of the scope of OpenShift. There's some common functionality between > OpenShift and vApps or CloudFormation templates, more so with the latter. > > If OpenShift can contribute to this effort please let us know. > > Thanks -Bill > > > PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints > > ------------------------------------------------- > > > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-576 > > URL: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-576 > > Project: CloudStack > > Issue Type: New Feature > > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > > Components: API, AWSAPI > > Reporter: Duncan Johnston-Watt > > > > Given the level of interest in CloudStack as a platform for private, > hybrid and public cloud one of the gaps is support for composite/multi-tier > application blueprints comparable to VMware vApp and CloudFormation > templates without necessarily slavishly following either of them. This is > almost certainly a new component. One that will leverage/enhance the > API/AWSAPI components amongst others. > > -- > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA > administrators > For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira >
