Hi Alex, Chip, That's easy, I will change the name :-)
@ Alex, I wasn't explicitly expecting co-existence of zone-wide primary storage and a "local" (cluster-wide only) primary storage. It seems you have assumed that would be a basic requirement, just wanted to confirm. If that were the case, when a user requests a data volume, must there be an option to choose or how will the allocation work? Will data volumes always come out of the zone-wide storage and root volume always is local or cluster-based primary storage? Finally, should we allow multiple zone-wide primary storage? Hari -----Original Message----- From: Alex Huang [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2013 1:25 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Shared NFS Zone-wide (primary) Block Storage > -----Original Message----- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 1:21 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Shared NFS Zone-wide (primary) Block Storage > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Hari Kannan <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Hello All, > > > > I wish to propose Shared NFS Zone-wide (primary) Block Storage > CloudStack - I have added some details here > (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Shared+NFS+Zo > ne-wide+(primary)+Block+Storage) along with a JIRA ticket 724 > > > > Please review and comment > > > > Hari Kannan > > > > I'm +1 to being able to create a zone-wide primary storage target, but > I'd like to see the feature name changed to be simply that (and not > talk about NFS). ;-) +1 It should support all. What we can do is say in the feature which technology may happen first. --Alex
