There cannot be feature parity since the ASA1000v is only supported on VMWare.
Should the ASA1000v be created on demand, or do we expect the admin to provision a pool of virtual ASAs? Should we support VXLAN as the isolation technology or VLANs? On 1/3/13 5:08 PM, "Manan Shah" <manan.s...@citrix.com> wrote: >Hi, > >I would like to propose a new feature for integrating Cisco ASA 1000v in >CS 4.1. I have created a JIRA ticket and provided the requirements at the >following location. Please provide feedback on the requirements. > >JIRA Ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-742 >Requirements: >https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Integrate+Cisco+ASA >+ >1000v+as+a+FW+for+CloudStack > >Additional details would be provided in the FS. > >Regards, >Manan Shah >
