On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Alex Huang <alex.hu...@citrix.com> wrote: >> The problem that Howie is talking about is that none of our projects >> are structured in the "standard" maven layout. This isn't just a test >> source issue. >> > I'm saying maven have a way to accommodate for that by specifying exactly > where the directory should be in the pom.xml. > > Like I said though, I don't know why it doesn't follow standard layout. > Maybe it was just easier to do the maven conversion this way? I think all > the directories in javelin has follow the current layout in 4.0 as well. We > can make all of the javelin directories follow the standard if there was no > clear call on how to layout the structures originally. > > --Alex
This isn't a Javelin branch issue at all... we had decided that we would convert from ant to maven, and in doing so we would keep the folder structure intact. I personally don't really care if we use the "standard" structure or not. I was just clarifying what Howie's point was, since it had been raised previously on the list.
