On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Sheng Yang <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, as I explained in CLOUDSTACK-307, the VPN support on SRX is too poor > with multiple tenants, and have too many limitation, so we want to drop the > support for remote access VPN on SRX, and looking forward for Cisco > ASA1000v support instead(which is a big new work). >
Thanks for explaining. I've moved the design document to the uncommitted designs page. > On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Chip Childers > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Sheng, >> >> When reviewing CLOUDSTACK-307, I noticed that the functional spec page >> [1] has a big statement at the top: "(This draft is obsolete, due to >> we drop the support for Remote Access VPN on SRX)". >> >> What does that mean? >> >> -chip >> >> >> [1] >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Remote+Access+VPN+support+on+SRX >>
