On Jan 11, 2013, at 7:17 PM, Alex Huang <[email protected]> wrote:
> Animesh, > > Can you also work with Jessica on any potential issues on docs? She noted > something in the original thread. > > --Alex > +1 to that please. Docs are really no different from code in this respect. >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 4:02 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [IP Clearance] Potential issues >> >> Folks >> >> I wanted to keep folks updated on where we are with IP clearance on the >> different issues and starting this new thread >> >> Here is the list of potential issues that has been identified. Please bring >> in any >> other issue if you think it needs to go through IP clearance. I will start >> individual threads on each one of them after the code has been posted to an >> external public location. If there is quick consensus on the ones >> recommended initially as 'No IP clearance needed' because they already >> followed the process I will skip them. As the list is big I am looking for >> volunteers for help in posting the code and working through individual >> threads >> >> CLOUDSTACK-774 : >> Code in ACS repo: No >> Functional Spec Posted: Yes >> Community Discussion Done: Yes >> Contribution Size Approx: 5000 lines >> Contributor : Frank >> IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: Yes >> >> >> >> CLOUDSTACK-306 : >> Code in ACS repo: Yes >> Functional Spec Posted: Yes >> Community Discussion Done: Yes in October >> Contribution Size Approx: 1500 lines >> Contributor : Sheng >> IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: Yes >> >> CLOUDSTACK-777/700 : >> Code in ACS repo: Yes >> Functional Spec Posted: No >> Community Discussion Done: Yes >> Contribution Size Approx: 500 lines >> Contributor : Kishan/Jayapal/Rajesh/Murali >> IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: Yes >> >> CLOUDSTACK-778/319 : >> Code in ACS repo: No >> Functional Spec Posted: No >> Community Discussion Done: Yes >> Contribution Size Approx: should be small >> Contributor : Vijayendra >> IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: This is a trivial issue so may be >> no >> >> >> CLOUDSTACK-299 : >> Code in ACS repo: UI code is there but backend is not >> Functional Spec Posted: Yes >> Community Discussion Done: Yes >> Contribution Size Approx: 1400 lines >> Contributor : Jayapal >> IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: Yes >> >> CLOUDSTACK-297 : >> Code in ACS repo: No, but posted on review board >> Functional Spec Posted: Yes >> Community Discussion Done: Yes >> Contribution Size Approx: 350 lines >> Contributor : Hari >> IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: >> >> CLOUDSTACK-197 : >> Code in ACS repo: Multiple patches posted on review board >> Functional Spec Posted: Yes >> Community Discussion Done: Yes >> Contribution Size Approx: 3000 lines >> Contributor : Likitha >> IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: No, since incremental patches >> were posted over a period >> >> >> CLOUDSTACK-192 : >> Code in ACS repo: No >> Functional Spec Posted: Yes >> Community Discussion Done: Yes, but no consensus reached >> Contribution Size Approx: 1000 lines >> Contributor : Sanjay >> IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: Yes, if community agrees to >> feature inclusion >> >> >> CLOUDSTACK-304 / 784 : >> Code in ACS repo: Yes >> Functional Spec Posted: Yes >> Community Discussion Done: Yes >> Contribution Size Approx: 600 >> Contributor : Alena >> IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: No, since commits were done >> way back in October over a period of 1 week >> >> >> CLOUDSTACK-265 : >> Code in ACS repo: Yes >> Functional Spec Posted: Yes >> Community Discussion Done: Yes >> Contribution Size Approx: 450 >> Contributor : Murali >> IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: Yes >> >> CLOUDSTACK-737 : >> Code in ACS repo: No >> Functional Spec Posted: Yes >> Community Discussion Done: Yes >> Contribution Size Approx: 2000 >> Contributor : Anthony >> IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: Yes >> >> CLOUDSTACK-177 : >> Code in ACS repo: Yes >> Functional Spec Posted: Yes >> Community Discussion Done: Yes >> Contribution Size Approx: 300 >> Contributor : Brian >> IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: No, multiple commits over >> several days >> >> CLOUDSTACK-662 : >> Code in ACS repo: Yes >> Functional Spec Posted: Yes >> Community Discussion Done: Yes >> Contribution Size Approx: 500 >> Contributor : Brian >> IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: No, multiple commits over >> several days >> >> >> CLOUDSTACK-176 : >> Code in ACS repo: Yes >> Functional Spec Posted: Yes >> Community Discussion Done: Yes >> Contribution Size Approx: 200 >> Contributor : Pranav >> IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: No, multiple commits over >> several days >> >> >> CLOUDSTACK-312 : >> Code in ACS repo: Yes >> Functional Spec Posted: Yes >> Community Discussion Done: Yes >> Contribution Size Approx: >> Contributor : Murali >> IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: Potentially yes, multiple >> commits in one day >> >> >> CLOUDSTACK-873 : >> Code in ACS repo: No >> Functional Spec Posted: No >> Community Discussion Done: No >> Contribution Size Approx: Work not started >> Contributor : Vijayendra/ Kelven >> IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: No as work has not started on it >> yet. Preliminary investigation done, running into issues with vmware. >> >> >> Thanks >> Animesh >
