On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote: > Ok to summarize for 306 we will not revert the changes at this time because > of technical issues. 306 will still have to go through the IP clearance > process and will be dropped if it does not pass the clearance. Please expect > a separate thread on IP clearance for 306 once Sheng posts the code. >
My opinion isn't the only one here though... so someone else can feel free to completely disagree and push for the revert to happen. > Thanks > Animesh > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] >> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 11:02 AM >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [ACS41] Concerns about where development has happened >> >> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Alex Huang <alex.hu...@citrix.com> wrote: >> > >> >> I thought that we had agreed that Chiradeep's network refactoring was >> >> going to merge into master first, and he's waiting for the reverts >> >> before doing his merge. Alex (others), what's your opinion? >> >> >> > Chip, >> > >> > We've looked at the effects from the reverts on javelin. I think the main >> problem is the commits for bug 306. This one is particularly bad because its >> fixes are intertwined now with the api_refactoring merge and it's difficult >> to >> for us to see a way out of this one. We like to ask the community for an >> exception for this bug on technical reasons for this one problem. I talked >> with >> Chiradeep and he's okay with that as well for the network refactoring branch. >> > >> > If for some reason the fixes for this bug cannot pass ip clearance then >> > we'll >> just have to deal with it. >> > >> > All the other reverts, we're fine with absorbing in javelin. >> >> I can accept that, as long as we all understand that we can't release any >> code >> from master (or any other branch that includes those commits) until that code >> has been accepted via IP clearance. We're just talking about CLOUDSTACK-306 >> commits though, right? If we don't pass the IP clearance process for that >> code, >> then we will have to stop until we get it pulled out. Hopefully that won't >> happen though. >> >> For the CLOUDSTACK-312 commits, any update on reverting them Murali? >> >> >> > --Alex >> > >
