+1 (binding) On 18/01/13 3:32 AM, "Chip Childers" <chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote:
>On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi ><animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote: >> Reposting with subject line VOTE >> >> Committers have binding votes for this decision. >> >> Please respond with your vote: >> +1 - Accept the donation and begin the process of bringing this >> +enhancement to CloudStack >> in via the IP clearance process >> +0 - Don't care >> -1 - Do not accept the donation >> >> This vote will remain open for ~72 hours. > >IMO, this is small enough not to qualify as "substantial". I would be >OK with this vote being cancelled, and a lazy consensus being reached >to simply have Anthony commit it (using his ICLA as the contractual >support for the donation). > >That being said, if we progress down the IP clearance path for this >patch, here's my vote: > >+1 (binding) > > >>> > > -----Original Message----- >>> > > From: Anthony Xu [mailto:xuefei...@citrix.com] >>> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 4:39 PM >>> > > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >>> > > Subject: [IP Clearance: CLOUDSTACK-737] support security group >>> > enabled >>> > > network in advanced zone >>> > > >>> > > Hi folks, >>> > > >>> > > I'd like to start the IP clearance process for the Citrix feature - >>> > support security >>> > > group enabled network in advanced zone >>> > > >>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-737 >>> > > >>> > > Citrix would like to donate this feature to Apache CloudStack, >>> > > >>> > > In 4.0, security group is only supported in basic zone, this >>>feature >>> > is to add >>> > > security group in advanced zone, then user can isolate VMs in the >>> > same guest >>> > > network. >>> > > >>> > > Here is FS, >>> > > >>> > >>>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Isolation+based >>> > + >>> > on+ >>> > > Security+Groups+in+Advance+zone >>> > > >>> > > This donation is a subset of the feature according to the FS Only >>> > support KVM >>> > > Only support one zone-wide security-enabled shared network >>> > > >>> > > Rest of this feature will be developed in Apache >>> > > >>> > > This is discussion thread >>> > > http://markmail.org/message/cle3d64ci6pobs2i >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > here is patch[Animesh>] http://people.apache.org/~anthonyxu/ >> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > Thanks, >>> > > Anthony >>> > > >>> > > >> >>
