+1. On 1/18/13 12:00 AM, "Sateesh Chodapuneedi" <sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com> wrote:
>+1 > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jessica Tomechak [mailto:jessica.tomec...@gmail.com] >> Sent: 18 January 2013 12:15 >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of "Documentation for various >> features" from Citrix >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] >> > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 1:51 PM >> > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of "Documentation for various >> > features" from Citrix >> > >> > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi < >> > animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote: >> > > Reposting with subject line VOTE. >> > > >> > > Committers have binding votes for this decision. >> > > >> > > Please respond with your vote: >> > > +1 - Accept the donation and begin the process of bringing this >> > > +enhancement to CloudStack >> > > in via the IP clearance process >> > > +0 - Don't care >> > > -1 - Do not accept the donation >> > > >> > > This vote will remain open for ~72 hours. >> > > >> > > Content Location: http://people.apache.org/~jtomechak >> > > >> > >> > I think it would be best to have an archive file, and an md5 checksum >> > to go along with it. I'd like to vote for those artifacts instead of >> > what's provided please. It will make the ip clearance process easier. >> > >> > >> I have provided an archive file and checksum. However I wonder whether >>it >> would be better to provide separate files for each feature, so they can >>be >> voted on separately. Please let me know. >> >> Jessica T. >> >> >> > > >> > >> -----Original Message----- >> > >> From: Jessica Tomechak [mailto:jessica.tomec...@citrix.com] >> > >> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 7:05 PM >> > >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >> > >> Subject: RE: [IP Clearance] Potential issues >> > >> >> > >> On people.apache.org/~jtomechak, I have posted all my docs related >> > >> to the bug items in the IP Clearance list which Animesh provided. >> > >> >> > >> I have made notations in the Doc sub-task of each bug, so that >> > >> anyone reviewing the proposed feature can easily find the >> documentation. >> > >> >> > >> In addition, I made a note for myself of the doc status of each bug >> > >> in that list, and here it is for anyone who is interested! >> > >> >> > >> CLOUDSTACK-774 : >> > >> Code in ACS repo: No >> > >> Functional Spec Posted: Yes >> > >> Community Discussion Done: Yes >> > >> Contribution Size Approx: 5000 lines Contributor : Frank IP >> > >> Clearance needed initial recommendation: Yes >> > >> Docs: None exist. This was not announced or supported as a Citrix >> > >> CP >> > >> 3.0.6 feature. >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> CLOUDSTACK-306 : >> > >> Code in ACS repo: Yes >> > >> Functional Spec Posted: Yes >> > >> Community Discussion Done: Yes in October Contribution Size Approx: >> > >> 1500 lines Contributor : Sheng IP Clearance needed initial >> > >> recommendation: Yes >> > >> Docs: Already submitted via reviewboard. Link and info in doc >>subtask. >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> CLOUDSTACK-777/700 : >> > >> Code in ACS repo: Yes >> > >> Functional Spec Posted: No >> > >> Community Discussion Done: Yes >> > >> Contribution Size Approx: 500 lines Contributor : >> > >> Kishan/Jayapal/Rajesh/Murali IP Clearance needed initial >> > >> recommendation: Yes >> > >> Docs: Pending on reviewboard. URL and notations in the doc subtask >> > >> of >> > the bug. >> > >> >> > >> CLOUDSTACK-778/319 : >> > >> Code in ACS repo: No >> > >> Functional Spec Posted: No >> > >> Community Discussion Done: Yes >> > >> Contribution Size Approx: should be small Contributor : Vijayendra >> > >> IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: This is a trivial issue >> > >> so may be no >> > >> Docs: Pending on reviewboard. Info is in the doc subtask of the >>bug. >> > >> >> > >> CLOUDSTACK-299 : >> > >> Code in ACS repo: UI code is there but backend is not Functional >> > >> Spec >> > Posted: >> > >> Yes Community Discussion Done: Yes Contribution Size Approx: 1400 >> > >> lines Contributor : Jayapal IP Clearance needed initial >> > >> recommendation: Yes >> > >> Docs: Pending on reviewboard. Link is provided in the description >> > >> of >> > the bug. >> > >> >> > >> CLOUDSTACK-297 : >> > >> Code in ACS repo: No, but posted on review board Functional Spec >> > >> Posted: Yes Community Discussion Done: Yes Contribution Size >>Approx: >> > >> 350 lines Contributor : Hari IP Clearance needed initial >>recommendation: >> > >> Docs: One paragraph of new docs on people.a.o. The URL is noted in >> > >> the doc subtask of the bug. >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~jtomechak/CLOUDSTACK-297/ >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> CLOUDSTACK-197 : >> > >> Code in ACS repo: Multiple patches posted on review board >> > >> Functional Spec >> > >> Posted: Yes Community Discussion Done: Yes Contribution Size >>Approx: >> > >> 3000 lines Contributor : Likitha IP Clearance needed initial >> > >> recommendation: No, since incremental patches were posted over a >> > >> period >> > >> Docs: Believe docs already exist, authored on the community side by >> > >> Sebastien G. >> > >> >> > >> CLOUDSTACK-192 : >> > >> Code in ACS repo: No >> > >> Functional Spec Posted: Yes >> > >> Community Discussion Done: Yes, but no consensus reached >> > >> Contribution Size >> > >> Approx: 1000 lines Contributor : Sanjay IP Clearance needed initial >> > >> recommendation: Yes, if community agrees to feature inclusion >> > >> Docs: On people.a.o. The URL is noted in the doc subtask of the >>bug. >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~jtomechak/CLOUDSTACK-192/ >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> CLOUDSTACK-304 / 784 : >> > >> Code in ACS repo: Yes >> > >> Functional Spec Posted: Yes >> > >> Community Discussion Done: Yes >> > >> Contribution Size Approx: 600 >> > >> Contributor : Alena >> > >> IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: No, since commits were >> > >> done way back in October over a period of 1 week >> > >> Docs: On people.a.o. The URL is noted in the doc subtask of the >>bug. >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~jtomechak/CLOUDSTACK-737/ >> > >> >> > >> CLOUDSTACK-265 : >> > >> Code in ACS repo: Yes >> > >> Functional Spec Posted: Yes >> > >> Community Discussion Done: Yes >> > >> Contribution Size Approx: 450 >> > >> Contributor : Murali >> > >> IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: Yes >> > >> Docs: Pending on reviewboard. URL is noted in the doc subtask of >> > >> the >> > bug. >> > >> >> > >> CLOUDSTACK-737 : >> > >> Code in ACS repo: No >> > >> Functional Spec Posted: Yes >> > >> Community Discussion Done: Yes >> > >> Contribution Size Approx: 2000 >> > >> Contributor : Anthony >> > >> IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: Yes >> > >> Docs: On people.a.o. The URL is noted in the doc subtask of the >>bug. >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~jtomechak/CLOUDSTACK-737/ >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> CLOUDSTACK-177 : >> > >> Code in ACS repo: Yes >> > >> Functional Spec Posted: Yes >> > >> Community Discussion Done: Yes >> > >> Contribution Size Approx: 300 >> > >> Contributor : Brian >> > >> IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: No, multiple commits >> > >> over several days >> > >> Docs: None were written, probably none needed >> > >> >> > >> CLOUDSTACK-662 : >> > >> Code in ACS repo: Yes >> > >> Functional Spec Posted: Yes >> > >> Community Discussion Done: Yes >> > >> Contribution Size Approx: 500 >> > >> Contributor : Brian >> > >> IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: No, multiple commits >> > >> over several days >> > >> Docs: None were written, probably none needed >> > >> >> > >> CLOUDSTACK-176 : >> > >> Code in ACS repo: Yes >> > >> Functional Spec Posted: Yes >> > >> Community Discussion Done: Yes >> > >> Contribution Size Approx: 200 >> > >> Contributor : Pranav >> > >> IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: No, multiple commits >> > >> over several days >> > >> Docs: None needed >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> CLOUDSTACK-312 : >> > >> Code in ACS repo: Yes >> > >> Functional Spec Posted: Yes >> > >> Community Discussion Done: Yes >> > >> Contribution Size Approx: >> > >> Contributor : Murali >> > >> IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: Potentially yes, >> > >> multiple commits in one day >> > >> Docs: Pending on reviewboard. The URL is noted in the Doc subtask >> > >> of >> > the bug. >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> CLOUDSTACK-873 : >> > >> Code in ACS repo: No >> > >> Functional Spec Posted: No >> > >> Community Discussion Done: No >> > >> Contribution Size Approx: Work not started Contributor : >> > >> Vijayendra/ Kelven IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: No >> > >> as work has not >> > started on it yet. >> > >> Preliminary investigation done, running into issues with vmware. >> > >> Docs: No existing docs. >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> Jessica Tomechak >> > >> >> > >> -----Original Message----- >> > >> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] >> > >> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 12:25 PM >> > >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >> > >> Subject: RE: [IP Clearance] Potential issues >> > >> >> > >> I am waiting for code to be posted to start the IP clearance >> > >> process for the ones identified in my email. Let me send reminders. >> > >> >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > >> > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] >> > >> > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 12:19 PM >> > >> > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >> > >> > Subject: Re: [IP Clearance] Potential issues >> > >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi >> > >> > <animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote: >> > >> > > To keep the community posted on status on IP clearance. I have >> > >> > > followed up >> > >> > with the contributors of the issues mentioned, as soon as the >> > >> > code is posted publicly, we will start the IP clearance review >>process. >> > >> > > >> > >> > > Thanks >> > >> > > Animesh >> > >> > >> > >> > Animesh (others) - are there any challenges that you need help >> > >> > with in getting this done? >> > > >> > >> >
