+1

2013/2/3 Joe Brockmeier <j...@zonker.net>:
> Hi all - thanks for the additional votes. I'm going to shut the vote
> down tomorrow morning (my time) and start the IPMC vote barring any
> show-stoppers before then.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joe
>
> On Sat, Feb 2, 2013, at 02:52 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Chip Childers
>> <chip.child...@sungard.com>wrote:
>>
>> > On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote:
>> > > +1 !
>> >
>> > Yay mentor vote!  Thanks Jim!
>> >
>> > Are any of our other mentors members able to spend some time and cast
>> > a vote?
>>
>>
>> Doing the functional testing to the best of my ability right now.
>>
>> However the sources look good with respect to signatures, and checksums.
>> Legal aspects look good.
>>
>> Rat shows no show stopper issues:
>>
>> Summary
>> -------
>> Notes: 13
>> Binaries: 209
>> Archives: 0
>> Standards: 1116
>>
>> Apache Licensed: 1083
>> Generated Documents: 0
>>
>> JavaDocs are generated and so license header is optional
>> Generated files do not required license headers
>>
>> 33 Unknown Licenses
>>
>> Those 33 seem to be in files that do not need headers, cannot have them
>> or
>> are generated.
>>
>> Couple of not so critical nit picking details (forgive me in advance):
>>
>> (1) Might be nice to put sha512 in the sources SHA hash file name so
>> people
>> know we're using SHA 512. I just tried all hash checksums until the last
>> one (sha512) worked.
>> (2) It seems as though Joe's j...@zonker.net RSA key A0207CD4 was used to
>> sign the sources instead of 05CD14DD?  All worked out when I pulled that
>> key down and check the signature.
>>
>> gpg apache-cloudstack-4.0.1-incubating-src.tar.bz2.asc gpg: Signature
>> made
>> Mon 28 Jan 2013 09:30:51 PM EET using RSA key ID A0207CD4
>> gpg: Good signature from "Joe Brockmeier (Zonker) <j...@zonker.net>"
>> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
>> gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
>> owner.
>> Primary key fingerprint: 7CE4 9725 0BE5 0FC6 9CA7  B190 A6D6 E733 A020
>> 7CD4
>>
>> I'm still going to continue to kick the tires (functional testing) and
>> might report back even after the vote. For the purposes of this vote, the
>> sources and legal matters are most important and at this point I can +1
>> it:
>>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Great job guys!
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> -- Alex
>
>
> Best,
>
> jzb
> --
> Joe Brockmeier
> j...@zonker.net
> Twitter: @jzb
> http://www.dissociatedpress.net/



-- 
Olivier Lamy
Talend: http://coders.talend.com
http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy

Reply via email to