On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 03:30:04PM +0530, Pradeep Soundararajan wrote: > Thanks Hugo, Wido and Noa for bringing this to some closure :) > > I am able to package rpm using "packaging/centos63/package.sh" after some > modification in the package.sh script since cloud.spec is looking for > 'cloudstack' Name. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > -mkdir -p $RPMDIR/SOURCES/cloud-$VERSION > +mkdir -p $RPMDIR/SOURCES/cloudstack-$VERSION > > > -(cd ../../; tar -c --exclude .git --exclude dist . | tar -C > $RPMDIR/SOURCES/cloud-$VERSION -x ) > -(cd $RPMDIR/SOURCES/; tar -czf cloud-$VERSION.tgz cloud-$VERSION) > +(cd ../../; tar -c --exclude .git --exclude dist . | tar -C > $RPMDIR/SOURCES/cloudstack-$VERSION -x ) > +(cd $RPMDIR/SOURCES/; tar -czf cloudstack-$VERSION.tgz cloudstack-$VERSION) > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Packaging went fine after the above modification but I have observed some > issues while installing the package. I believe you have changed the > installation path from */cloud/* to */cloudstack/* and also observed you have > changed all the rpm names from cloud* to cloudstack*. If that is a situation > then I feel we cannot upgrade from 4.0 since they were pointing to different > rpm names and they were loaded in a different location. I feel, this would > raise lot of compatibility issues here and there. > > Noticed you have changed cloud-client to cloudstack-management. I feel, we > have to modify install.sh script accordingly in order to satisfy all the > changed conditions.
Haven't we removed install.sh completely? > > Time being shall we keep all the internals intact with the same name cloud > instead of cloudstack? > > Please let us know if any one see any other issues. > > Thanks, > Pradeep S
