This will help us to resolve the problem only with package.sh script but we have to find a way to resolve it globally by adding a global variable name.
Thanks, Pradeep S From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of Wido den Hollander Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 12:56 PM To: Wido den Hollander; Hugo Trippaers Cc: cloudstack; Pradeep Soundararajan Subject: Re: Review Request: Added a global package name in the packaging script This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9409/ Ship it! Seems fine with me, but Hugo has the most RPM knowledge, so I'll let this up to him. From what I understand, package.sh hasn't been used that much. - Wido On February 12th, 2013, 12:16 p.m., Pradeep Soundararajan wrote: Review request for cloudstack, Hugo Trippaers and Wido den Hollander. By Pradeep Soundararajan. Updated Feb. 12, 2013, 12:16 p.m. Description Added a global package name in the packaging script Diffs * packaging/centos63/package.sh (5b1bab49b615e504273be3fe69335c10782d009a) View Diff<https://reviews.apache.org/r/9409/diff/>
