On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 6:12 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Jessica Tomechak > <jessica.tomec...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I've noticed quite a few bugs against documentation are being filed > without > > the Component field being set to Doc. I rely pretty heavily on that field > > so I can easily query for writing tasks. It's more reliable than querying > > against text in the subject line, but only if it's being set > consistently. > > > > I'm wondering whether the lack of usage of the Doc component indicates > that > > people aren't aware of it. Or does it mean people just don't like having > to > > set it? > > > > Jessica T. > > It's just one of plenty fields - and it's easy to miss. I'd attribute > it to just forgetting/not seeing/etc. > Folks triaging the bugs should rectify the issue I'd think. > > --David >
OK, I didn't hear any outcry against the component, so I'll bet you are right, David. I do fix these whenever I happen to notice them. So, I guess, everyone, consider this a call to please set that component to Doc whenever appropriate. It will surely help your bug catch the notice of a writer, which is what you want! Jessica T.
