[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13588700#comment-13588700
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-452:
------------------------------------------------------------
Commit 476687d931596bee0f50a08bdf107d6c505e0072 in branch refs/heads/4.1 from
Jessica Wang <[email protected]>
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudstack.git;h=476687d ]
Revert "CLOUDSTACK-452: cloudstack UI - network menu - guest network section -
network detail - add IPv6 CIDR field, IPv6 Gateway field."
This reverts commit a565d0b699478849d88730faf8a9c9bf7892aef3.
> IPv6 support
> ------------
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-452
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-452
> Project: CloudStack
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
> default.)
> Reporter: Wido den Hollander
> Assignee: Sheng Yang
> Fix For: Future
>
>
> This is quite a large feature, but we are lacking complete IPv6 support at
> this moment.
>
> We should support IPv6 for:
> - The Management server itself
> - Communication with the Hypervisors
> - Communication with the System VMs
> Those three are probably the easiest work, we also need to support IPv6 for
> instances.
>
> In both the Advanced and Basic zone Instances should be able to get a non-NAT
> true and native IPv6 address.
>
> We should also not limit them to having one IP, they should be able to get
> multiple IPv6 addresses.
>
> In the basic zone it can be done pretty easily by having the Virtual Router
> also hand out IPv6 over DHCPv6 and have your router in the network handle the
> gateway work.
>
> In the advanced zone it becomes more difficult.
> One way could be that the network admin creates a static route for a /48
> towards a Virtual Router and then the VR can hand out /64s to Instances.
>
> But static routing can become a problem, so you might want to use OSPF, LISP
> or even iBGP for getting those prefixes to the VR.
>
> This is a big feature, but I think the Basic zone is the easiest for now.
> In the Advanced Zone you COULD keep everything behind the VR IPv4 and have
> the VR do IPv6 loadbalancing, but that would still not be true IPv6
> connectivity.
>
> NAT in the VR seems like a firewall, but a true statefull firewall in the VR
> could do the same while the Instances still have publicly routeable IPv6
> addresses.
>
> There is no functional spec on this yet, but we have to keep this in mind
> that we need IPv6 support. People are running out of IPv4 space.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
