The last release/build that happened on NetScaler 10.0e is 72_5005, the changes required for working with CS 4.1 will be accommodated in the next release that happens after 72_5005 and which will be released in April first week. So I cannot guess the number right now. The challenge is to document saying "Any build beyond NetScaler 10.0e 72_5005 is appropriate for autoscale".
-Vijay > -----Original Message----- > From: Radhika Puthiyetath [mailto:radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 6:02 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: [DOCS] Sprint on Friday > > Should I say that the supported NetScaler version is 10.0.e build 73 and > beyond ? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Radhika Puthiyetath [mailto:radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 5:56 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: [DOCS] Sprint on Friday > > Thanks Vijay. I shall incorporate the changes ASAP. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vijay Venkatachalam [mailto:vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 5:35 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: [DOCS] Sprint on Friday > > Radhika, > > We have fixed a bug recently in NetScaler to accommodate CS 4.1 > changes. > > You might want to document the compatible NetScaler version for AutoScale > is > > NS_10e_72_5005+ (meaning not inclusive of NS_10e_72_5005) > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1357 > > > Thanks, > Vijay V. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jessica Tomechak [mailto:jessica.tomec...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 5:20 PM > > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [DOCS] Sprint on Friday > > > > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Joe Brockmeier <j...@zonker.net> > wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013, at 12:20 PM, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote: > > > > I suppose CLOUDSTACK-856: Document CPU and memory overcommit > > > > functionality is signed up by Jessica. > > > > > > CC'ed so she can grab that one if she wants it. Or even if she > > > doesn't want it, but is willing to do the work anyway. :-) > > > > > > > I grabbed it. Radhika was right, I had said I'd do that one. > > > > > > > > > > > As I am familiar with the NetScaler AutoScale feature, I would > > > > pick up > > > > CLOUDSTACK-895: Document autoscale request handling capacity by > > > > provisioning LB appliances feature. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > jzb > > > -- > > > Joe Brockmeier > > > j...@zonker.net > > > Twitter: @jzb > > > http://www.dissociatedpress.net/ > > > > > > > I'm updating bugs and adding whatever comments seem helpful ahead of > > the sprint. See you tomorrow in cloudstack-dev on freenode! > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/4.1+Doc+Sprints > > +every+Friday
