Chip,
 
+1 for bug sprint - However can this be extended to more of a week rather than 
a day because 3/22 is date to cut RC1 [1]. With the given outstanding number of 
defects, I am afraid it would not be sufficient to close the release with 
decent quality in my opinion. Critical and Blockers should be closed by them. 
We can look at the major and defer the ones that are not necessary and the rest 
can be fixed. Within the next 10 days, I think that can be achieved.  Also need 
to leave some room for incoming blockers.

For Master may be 1 day a week should be fine. 

[1] 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+4.1+Release

Thanks
/Sudha

-----Original Message-----
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] 
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 9:01 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [ACS41][QA] Bug fixing sprint?

Hi all,

Last week, Sebastian raised the question of doing a bug sprint for 4.1.
I'd like to see what people think about doing something like a 1 day sprint on 
Tuesday of next week.

I have a couple of concerns about doing this, which I'll explain below.
I'm not sure what the right answer is to addressing these concerns, but we need 
to at least be aware of them:

1 - We will need to be very careful about 4.1 branch stability, especially 
build and unit test stability.  Master has been having a rough time of it, and 
we don't have tooling in place to ensure that commits are good before they go 
into the repo yet.

2 - Generally, I prefer to keep code "churn" to a minimum for release branches 
(i.e.: reduced number of commits in the branch), specifically so that risk of 
regressions and / or new bugs being introduced is limited.

However, the positive side of doing something like this would be to help knock 
down our total bug count from it's rather high number.

We currently have a pretty high bug count for 4.1 (certainly not release 
quality yet):

8 Blocker
24 Critical
48 Major
23 Minor
1 Trivial

Any thoughts?

Reply via email to