On Mar 13, 2013, at 9:22 AM, Joe Brockmeier <j...@zonker.net> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013, at 08:04 AM, Chip Childers wrote: >> On Mar 13, 2013, at 8:46 AM, Joe Brockmeier <j...@zonker.net> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012, at 02:13 PM, John Kinsella wrote: >>>> Did we ever get this setup? >>> >>> Sorry - no, I dropped this. Picking back up now. I'm going to send a >>> firm proposal to the list and if we can get consensus I'll start getting >>> it done. If at all humanly possible, I'd like to have analytics in place >>> before the 4.1.0 launch. >>> >>> One question I have - is -dev still the appropriate place to discuss >>> this, or would -marketing be sufficient? >>> >>> On one hand, I suspect many folks on -dev are not that interested in our >>> website analytics. On the other, I'm concerned about moving a >>> conversation that touches on privacy, etc. to a list that many >>> committers and PPMC members aren't watching closely. Thoughts? >> >> Marketing seems good to me, except that I'd appreciate if it was >> brought back to the dev list when the plan is baked. > > Happy to report back to -dev, but I'm curious whether this would imply > giving the -dev list 72 hours to digest/discuss any plans made on the > -marketing list?
Probably, but I'd say that whatever seems like The Right Thing (tm) is the way to go.. ;) > > Best, > > jzb > -- > Joe Brockmeier > j...@zonker.net > Twitter: @jzb > http://www.dissociatedpress.net/ >
