Pretty short meeting this week, it looks like DST took its toll... On Wed, Mar 13, 2013, at 12:32 PM, ASF IRC Services wrote: > Members present: Animesh, kdamage, topcloud, jzb > > ---------------- > Meeting summary: > ---------------- > > 1. Preface > > 2. Active Feature Release: Overall Status > > 3. Active Feature Release: Feature Status > > 4. Active Feature Release: QA status > > 5. Active Feature Release: Docs Status > > 6. Active Feature Release: Additional Issues? > > 7. Active Bugfix Release: Overview > > 8. Master Branch > > 9. Infrastructure > > 10. others? > > IRC log follows: > > > # 1. Preface # > 17:05:42 [jzb]: Let's start with the active agenda > > > # 2. Active Feature Release: Overall Status # > 17:06:12 [jzb]: Chip sent regrets this week, anyone have an overall 4.1.0 > status to report? > 17:06:48 [jzb]: looking over the bug list, there's still quite a bit of > work to be done on 4.1.0 > 17:07:26 [Animesh]: we have now 26 blocker/critical open, yesterday > evening it was 32 > 17:07:48 [jzb]: that's good progress > 17:08:11 [Animesh]: The plan is to aggressively close down > blocker/crtical to a low number by end of this week > 17:08:26 [jzb]: still quite high, though - given that we're nine days > from RC on the schedule > 17:09:19 [jzb]: Animesh: anything else to report for overall 4.1 status? > 17:09:33 [Animesh]: agreed, Sudha and I meet daily to go over the > blockers and critical for 4.1. At this point we are prioritizing 4.1 over > 4.2 > 17:09:56 [Animesh]: that's all from my side > 17:10:05 [jzb]: Animesh: OK, thanks > 17:10:18 [jzb]: anyone else on overall status on 4.1.0? > 17:10:41 [jzb]: Animesh: do you know if Sudha is going to be joining > today? > 17:11:03 [Animesh]: I dont see her around but she is expected to join > 17:11:26 [jzb]: does anyone have anything to report on 4.1.0 feature > status? > > > # 3. Active Feature Release: Feature Status # > 17:12:18 [jzb]: moving along > > > # 4. Active Feature Release: QA status # > 17:12:48 [jzb]: any reports on the QA status for 4.1.0? > 17:13:33 [jzb]: moving along > > > # 5. Active Feature Release: Docs Status # > 17:14:24 [jzb]: we have 25 unresolved issues in Jira for docs > 17:14:53 [topcloud]: jzb: sudha tried to joined around 9 but I told her > it's at 10. > 17:14:53 [jzb]: six of those issues are unassigned at the moment > 17:15:08 [jzb]: topcloud: OK > 17:15:32 [jzb]: several of the unassigned issues are just converting some > docs from XML that were missed in the original conversions > 17:15:44 [jzb]: sorry, into XML/Publican > 17:15:44 [jzb]: not from > 17:16:13 [jzb]: we could use a few folks to step up and take those - it's > not terribly difficult, and if you are not a committer I'm happy to work > with you and help in the process & getting the final result committed. > 17:16:36 [jzb]: I have several items on my plate as well - hope to finish > those this week/weekend. > 17:16:51 [jzb]: with the exception of release notes, which will be one of > the last things finalized. > 17:16:58 [jzb]: that's all I've got on docs > 17:16:58 [jzb]: anybody else? > 17:17:49 [jzb]: alrighty > > > # 6. Active Feature Release: Additional Issues? # > 17:18:11 [jzb]: any additional issues for 4.1.0 to report? > 17:19:43 [jzb]: ok > > > # 7. Active Bugfix Release: Overview # > 17:20:11 [jzb]: I'm going to roll up all of the active bug fix release > discussion into one > 17:20:35 [jzb]: basically - not a lot of progress to report. We now have > three blockers that need to be resolved before I'd be willing to call for > a vote on the release. > 17:21:26 [jzb]: CLOUDSTACK-528 > 17:21:33 [jzb]: CLOUDSTACK-1151 > 17:21:41 [jzb]: CLOUDSTACK-1648 > 17:22:03 [jzb]: actually, we do have a fix in for CLOUDSTACK-1151 but we > need someone to test. > 17:22:43 [jzb]: any other issues for 4.0.2 ? > 17:23:20 [Animesh]: Thats all I see > > > # 8. Master Branch # > 17:24:21 [jzb]: anything to discuss or report about the master branch > this week? > > > # 9. Infrastructure # > 17:26:05 [jzb]: anything to discuss or report around infrastructure this > week? > > > # 10. others? # > 17:27:50 [jzb]: Any other topics this week? > 17:28:42 [kdamage]: is the 10am meeting a one-off for this week? > 17:29:12 [jzb]: kdamage: nope. > 17:29:18 [jzb]: kdamage: the meeting is at 17:00 UTC > 17:29:26 [jzb]: 17:00 is no affected by DST > 17:29:34 [jzb]: I mentioned this in the weekly reminder about the meeting > 17:29:43 [jzb]: s/is no/is not/ > 17:29:51 [kdamage]: Ahh, yeah DST threw me off > 17:30:41 [jzb]: I'm guessing you're not alone. > 17:30:49 [jzb]: well, that seems to be it for discussion this week > 17:31:11 [jzb]: see you all next week >
Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
