Agreed!, We can't really wireframe or skin it if we don't know/determine the site flow first.
KELCEY DAMAGE Infrastructure Systems Architect www.backbonetechnology.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- kel...@backbonetechnology.com address: 55 East 7th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5T 1M4 tel: +1 604 713 8560 ext:114 fax: +1 604 605 0964 skype: kelcey.damage >-----Original Message----- >From: Mathias Mullins [mailto:mathias.mull...@citrix.com] >Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 11:21 AM >To: cloudstack-marketing@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: website idea > >+1 on Joe's thought here that that we need to put together a framework >before we can really put a website around it. We need to really come up with >where are hot points. > >I know that Sebastian started this one back up, and I'm not sure, but did >people >miss the mock up that Sonny did as well? I think the original concept that he >was going for may not be 100%, but is on the realm that John was talking about. >Original, Specific and enticing. > >So let's get a redesign site map started on the wiki, and then build the >website >around that. Does that sound like a better way to tackle it? > >Matt > > >On 3/5/13 1:31 PM, "Joe Brockmeier" <j...@zonker.net> wrote: > >>On Tue, Mar 5, 2013, at 12:28 PM, John Kinsella wrote: >>> On Mar 5, 2013, at 9:40 AM, Sebastien Goasguen <run...@gmail.com> >wrote: >>> > and we also need someone to actually come up with the design and >>> > set >>>it up on apache infra. >>> >>> >>> I'm going to touch base with our designers to see if we might be able >>> to spare a few cycles to sketch something up. No promises yet... >> >>Before we start getting (more) visual designs, do we have the story >>flow that we want to use in place that would inform a new visual design? >> >>Best, >> >>jzb >>-- >>Joe Brockmeier >>j...@zonker.net >>Twitter: @jzb >>http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
