Hi, I think 3.0.2 is not pre-alpha by far. I can easily run a production environment on it with billing integration and customers are happy. Nothing is perfect ever but there is always a workaround. If you could describe what is unusable or blows up we might be able to help.
Regards Tamas Monos DDI +44(0)2034687012 Chief Technical Office +44(0)2034687000 Veber: The Hosting Specialists Fax +44(0)871 522 7057 http://www.veber.co.uk Follow us on Twitter: www.twitter.com/veberhost Follow us on Facebook: www.facebook.com/veberhost -----Original Message----- From: Alexey Zilber [mailto:alexeyzil...@gmail.com] Sent: 22 June 2012 02:33 To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: CS 3.0.2 does not report router system vm. That's a funny place for it to show up, imho. It's a system vm. I'm pretty sure when I was using the Xen hypervisor it was showing up under system vm's. Then again, the 3.x branch is so pre-alpha I don't know where stuff will show up anymore. Any news on when the incubator project is going to be ramped up? 3.0.2 is essentially unusable. Just adding another hypervisor to the mix causes it to blow up. I did notice a ton of bug fixes, but those won't show up in any builds till the incubator project is up and running I'm guessing. Thanks, Alex On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Edison Su <edison...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Alexey Zilber [mailto:alexeyzil...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 5:14 PM > > To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org > > Subject: CS 3.0.2 does not report router system vm. > > > > Hi All, > > > > This looks like a bug in CS 3.0.2. I did a clean install. > > Everything is > > on Centos 6.2. Installed KVM as the first hypervisor in the cluster. > > Launched an instance. virsh reports: > > > > [root@kvm1 init.d]# virsh list > > Id Name State > > ---------------------------------- > > 1 s-1-VM running > > 2 v-2-VM running > > * 3 r-4-VM running* > > 4 i-2-3-VM running > > > > > > #3 above is the system router vm. It does not show up under 'system > > vm' > > Router VM should not be shown up under "system vm". It should be under > "zone->network->" > > > under the Zones. (#1 and #2 do). This is concerning because when I > > used > > Xen, it reported it correctly. > > > > Thanks, > > Alex >
