On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Caleb Call <calebc...@me.com> wrote: > > On Aug 26, 2012, at 10:35 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: > >> On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Caleb Call <cc...@overstock.com> wrote: >>> Is it possible to setup a basic zone and be able to allow the use of load >>> balancers (virtual)? I've tried setting up a couple different combination >>> of network offerings but I always get an error message similar to this when >>> I setup the zone: >>> >>> "failed to create a guest network for basic zone. Error: Provider >>> VirtualRouter doesn't support services combination: [Dhcp, Dns, Lb, >>> UserData]" >>> >>> So, is it possible? If it is, what am I doing wrong? >>> >>> Thanks >>> >> >> >> It used to be possible. >> In 2.2.x there was a concept of Elastic Load Balancer. I _think_ the >> networking changes introduced in 3.0 broke ELB (but I could be >> completely wrong about the reason why) , and when it was resurrected >> it was a Netscaler-dependent feature - so it is possible, has been >> done in the past, but certainly doesn't currently work in the 3.0.x >> versions. >> >> --David > > > Thanks David and Mice, it's too bad this is no longer supported. Is this > something that is (or could be) on the roadmap for future development? Seems > this would be a much wanted feature for small and/or test environments where > the cost of netscalers is prohibitive and the complexity of an advanced zone > isn't needed. > > Thanks
I don't know if it is on any roadmap - but it certainly could be if someone wanted to do the work. And hopefully a good start could be had by looking at how it was done in 2.2.x --David
