You can design a network offering without any "edge" services (such as NAT, LB, FW) and that should result in a VR that does only DHCP and userdata http://www.shapeblue.com/2012/05/10/using-the-api-for-advanced-network-management/
-----Original Message----- From: Marc Cirauqui [mailto:mcirau...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 11:00 PM To: cloudstack-users Subject: Re: Stop Virtual Router Using a Public IP Virtual routers are responsible for forwarding traffic to and from internet, so no. You can use basic networking, which do not use virtual routers, but network options are not the same and probably will force you to redesign your deployment. On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 5:19 PM, James Jeffrey <james.jeff...@cpp.co.uk>wrote: > Hello, > > Where virtual routers are only being used for DHCP and User Data is > there a way to stop them being allocated a public IP? > > Thanks, > > James > > This is an email from CPPGroup Plc, a company registered in England > and Wales. > Registered number: 07151159. Registered office: Holgate Park, York, > YO26 4GA. > This message may contain information that is confidential. If you are > not the intended recipient, you may not peruse, use, disseminate, > distribute or copy this message. If you have received this message in > error, please notify the sender immediately by email, facsimile or > telephone and either return or destroy the original message. > > CPPGroup Plc accepts no responsibility for any changes made to this > message after it has been sent by the original author. This email has > been scanned for all viruses by the Webroot Email Security System. >
