The multiples IP's for nic's it's also a great feature to use heartbeat in the vms .
*Facundo Guerrero* *System Administrator* *IPaddress integradores de soluciones* Tel: (54 11) 6009-5800 int 117 GPG ID: 0x14F4C737 fguerr...@ipaddress.com.ar *www.ipaddress.com.ar* 2012/11/21 Jonathan Bastin <jonathan.bas...@peerpointinternet.co.uk> > Personally for immediate requirements multiple IP's per nic would surfice > but also multiple nics to different networks as well could be a request. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Hari Kannan [mailto:hari.kan...@citrix.com] > Sent: 21 November 2012 20:05 > To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance > > It is an interesting topic - as I see it, there seem to be some > hypervisors/OS limitations (on virtual environments) that, while allowing > multiple nics per VM, limit the number - so, by extending in 2 dimensions > (multiple nics per vm and multiple ips per nics), you can extend the number > of IPs per VM - for that reason, I can see the benefit. Another reason, > could be that AWS supports both, so stay compatible and competitive, we may > need to consider it. Plus, there may be technical challenges in > implementing > multiple nics in a Basic network zone (this I'm not sure, esp if it is even > possible to have multiple IPs per nic on basic zone).. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Boylan, James [mailto:james.boy...@orbitz.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:46 AM > To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance > > Single NIC. I can definitely seeing situations where you would want to have > multiple interfaces for managing the traffic within a VM. But I don't > really > see the real benefit in a cloud environment for having a number of IPs > assigned to one NIC. (Cloud environment not just a virtual environment.) > > -- James > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Hari Kannan [mailto:hari.kan...@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 1:42 PM > To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance > > @James: Are you saying there is no benefit in having a single VM having > multiple IPs or a single NIC having multiple IPs? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:jonathan.bas...@peerpointinternet.co.uk] > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:41 AM > To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance > > But if customer requests it then you need to provide it. May people use IP > locking than port locking for SSL certs. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Boylan, James [mailto:james.boy...@orbitz.com] > Sent: 21 November 2012 19:37 > To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance > > I don't actually see the benefit of this. It really goes against the whole > point of a Cloud environment. You shouldn't find yourself in a situation > where you need multiple IPs per interface. > > -- James > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:jonathan.bas...@peerpointinternet.co.uk] > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 1:35 PM > To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance > > I said to fill my request it would need to work on advanced with the guest > network as this is where the pool sits. I also request this on a shared and > an isolated network. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Anthony Xu [mailto:xuefei...@citrix.com] > Sent: 21 November 2012 19:29 > To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance > > Where is FS for this feature? Will this feature be added to basic zone? If > that's the case, Security group needs to be changed, otherwise the second > IP > will not work because of anti-spoofing. > > Anthony > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:jonathan.bas...@peerpointinternet.co.uk] > > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:11 AM > > To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org > > Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance > > > > I suggested that a few emails back and ultimately that is the quickest > > way and a dev did post back to say they were working on it for release > > 4.1 if it makes it. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Clayton Weise [mailto:cwe...@iswest.net] > > Sent: 21 November 2012 18:23 > > To: cloudstack-users > > Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance > > > > Given that limitation, couldn't CloudStack just take whatever steps > > necessary to make sure that the IP address doesn't get assigned to > > anything else and let the user manually add that second address? It > > just seems easier > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerr...@ipaddress.com.ar] > > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 9:50 AM > > To: cloudstack-users > > Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance > > > > KVM has a limit of 8 nic's per VM. and there is no limit for multimes > > ip's on the same nic. > > > > *Facundo Guerrero* > > *System Administrator* > > *IPaddress integradores de soluciones* > > Tel: (54 11) 6009-5800 int 117 > > GPG ID: 0x14F4C737 > > fguerr...@ipaddress.com.ar > > *www.ipaddress.com.ar* > > > > > > > > > > 2012/11/21 Chip Childers <chip.child...@sungard.com> > > > > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Anthony Xu <xuefei...@citrix.com> > > wrote: > > > > CS manages User VM IP through DHCP service, I'm not sure DHCP can > > > deliver two IPs for one MAC/NIC. > > > > I agree that multiple NICs is easier than multiple IPs on same NIC. > > > > > > Since they are virtual hardware anyway, it's logical to just create > > > new interfaces instead of dealing with the difficulties of multiple > > > IPs per NIC. > > > > > > > Anthony > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > > >> From: Matthew Hartmann [mailto:mhartm...@tls.net] > > > >> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 8:54 AM > > > >> To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org > > > >> Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance > > > >> > > > >> What would be really neat is if you could have multiple NICs per > > VM > > > >> without having to have multiple virtual networks. For example, if > > > >> I'm hosting a shared web server and need to host multiple SSL > > > >> websites, I'm going to need not just multiple public IPs but > > > >> multiple NICs as well on the VM. IMO, I believe this would be > > > >> easier than trying to manage multiple IPs on one VIF. > > > >> > > > >> Matthew Hartmann > > > >> Systems Administrator | V: 812.378.4100 x 850 | E: > > > >> mhartm...@tls.net > > > >> > > > >> TLS.NET, Inc. > > > >> http://www.tls.net > > > >> > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > > >> From: Jonathan Bastin > > > >> [mailto:jonathan.bas...@peerpointinternet.co.uk] > > > >> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 1:35 PM > > > >> To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org > > > >> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance > > > >> > > > >> It should be what ever the user wishes to allocate per single nic > > > >> > > > >> Regards, > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> Jonathan Bastin > > > >> 07739668262 > > > >> > > > >> ----- Reply message ----- > > > >> From: "Anthony Xu" <xuefei...@citrix.com> > > > >> To: "cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org" > > > >> <cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org> > > > >> Subject: Multiple IP's to one instance > > > >> Date: Mon, Nov 19, 2012 18:21 > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM' > > > >> > > > >> Does that mean there is one NIC in guest VM, and there are more > > > >> than one IPs on this guest NIC? > > > >> > > > >> Can you elaborate more how you are going to implement it? > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> Anthony > > > >> > > > >> > -----Original Message----- > > > >> > From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi > > > >> > [mailto:jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com] > > > >> > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 3:50 AM > > > >> > To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org > > > >> > Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance > > > >> > > > > >> > I will work on this feature 'multiple IP's per NIC on guest VM'. > > > >> Hope > > > >> > fully it will come in 4.1 release. > > > >> > > > > >> > Thanks, > > > >> > Jayapal > > > >> > > > > >> > > On 16/11/12 4:20 PM, "Geoff Higginbottom" > > > >> > > <geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >This gets my vote > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >Regards > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >Geoff > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >-----Original Message----- > > > >> > > >From: Jonathan Bastin > > > >> > [mailto:jonathan.bas...@peerpointinternet.co.uk] > > > >> > > >Sent: 16 November 2012 10:00 > > > >> > > >To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org > > > >> > > >Subject: RE: Multiple IP's to one instance > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >Everybody wanting this please vote for it and see if we can > > > >> > > >get > > > >> this > > > >> > to > > > >> > > >happen. > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >-----Original Message----- > > > >> > > >From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerr...@ipaddress.com.ar] > > > >> > > >Sent: 16 November 2012 03:25 > > > >> > > >To: cloudstack-users > > > >> > > >Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >I not use the dhcp server to assign the ip into the vm. i > > only > > > >> made > > > >> > nat > > > >> > > >1:1 to other ip's in the network, then i add the new ip into > > > >> > > >the > > > >> vm > > > >> > as > > > >> > > >eth0:1, eth0:2. > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >Jira link > > > > >> > > >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-24 > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >I'll send you the modifications that i made to the script. > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >2012/11/15 Clayton Weise <cwe...@iswest.net> > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> Also, what is your bug ID for this feature request so we > > can > > > >> vote > > > >> > on it. > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> -----Original Message----- > > > >> > > >> From: Facundo Guerrero [mailto:fguerr...@ipaddress.com.ar] > > > >> > > >> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:00 PM > > > >> > > >> To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org > > > >> > > >> Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> Jonathan > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> Thats is not possible yet, i open a feature request asking > > > >> > > >> for > > > >> > this. > > > >> > > >> I made some hacks on the virtual router to add more that > > > >> > > >> open IP > > > >> > on > > > >> > > >> the same > > > >> > > >VM. > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> 2012/11/15 Jonathan Bastin > > > >> > <jonathan.bas...@peerpointinternet.co.uk> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > I have made a guest network (cloudstack implementation > > > >> advanced > > > >> > > >> > networking) with live IP's that is a shared network. > > > >> > > >> > What I > > > >> want > > > >> > to > > > >> > > >> > know > > > >> > > >> is > > > >> > > >> > how to I assign more than one IP to an instance without > > > >> > > >> > using > > > >> an > > > >> > > >> > isolated network with a router. I literally want to > > assign > > > >> > > >> > say > > > >> 5 > > > >> > > >> > IP's to one instance. > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> ---------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> > > >> - > > - > > > >> > > >> ---- > > > >> -- > > > >> > --- > > > >> > > >> - > > > >> > > >> ---------------------------------------------------- > > > >> > > >> > This email (including any attachments) is intended only > > > >> > > >> > for > > > >> the > > > >> > > >> > recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or > > > >> > privileged > > > >> > > >> > information and should not be read, copied or otherwise > > > >> > > >> > used > > > >> by > > > >> > any > > > >> > > >> > other person. If you are not the named recipient please > > > >> contact > > > >> > the > > > >> > > >> > sender and delete the email from your system. The > > author's > > > >> > > >> > incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own > > > >> > > >> > and > > > >> not > > > >> > > >> > necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point > > > >> > > >> > Internet > > > >> > Ltd > > > >> > > >> > or associated > > > >> > > >companies. > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >------------------------------------------------------------ > > > >> > > >- > > - > > > >> > > >---- > > > >> -- > > > >> > --- > > > >> > > >--- > > > >> > > >------------------------------------------------ This email > > > >> > (including > > > >> > > >any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named > > above. > > > >> > It > > > >> > > >may contain confidential or privileged information and > > > >> > > >should not > > > >> be > > > >> > > >read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you > > are > > > >> > > >not > > > >> > the > > > >> > > >named recipient please contact the sender and delete the > > email > > > >> from > > > >> > > >your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and > > > >> thoughts > > > >> > are > > > >> > > >their own and not necessarily representative of those of the > > > >> > > >Peer > > > >> > Point > > > >> > > >Internet Ltd or associated companies. > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >ShapeBlue provides a range of strategic and technical > > > >> > > >consulting > > > >> and > > > >> > > >implementation services to help IT Service Providers and > > > >> Enterprises > > > >> > to > > > >> > > >build a true IaaS compute cloud. ShapeBlue¹s expertise, > > > >> > > >combined > > > >> > with > > > >> > > >CloudStack technology, allows IT Service Providers and > > > >> > > >Enterprises > > > >> > to > > > >> > > >deliver true, utility based, IaaS to the customer or end-user. > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >________________________________ > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and > > > >> > > >are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it > > > >> > > >is > > > >> > addressed. > > > >> > > >Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the > > author > > > >> > > >and > > > >> > do > > > >> > > >not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd. If you > > > >> > > >are not > > > >> > the > > > >> > > >intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any > > > >> > > >action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. > > > >> > > >Please > > > >> > contact > > > >> > > >the sender if you believe you have received this email in > > error. > > > >> > Shape > > > >> > > >Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> - > > - > > > >> ---- > > > >> ----- > > > >> ---------------------------------------------- This email > > > >> (including any > > > >> attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. > > > >> It may contain confidential or privileged information and should > > > >> not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you > > > >> are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete > > > >> the email from your system. > > > >> The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their > > > >> own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point > > > >> Internet Ltd or associated companies. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > - > > --------------------------------------------------- This email > > (including any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) > > named above. It may contain confidential or privileged information and > > should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If > > you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete > > the email from your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views > > and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of those > > of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies. > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ---------------------------------------------- This email (including any > attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may > contain confidential or privileged information and should not be read, > copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the named > recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from your system. > The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and > not > necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or > associated companies. > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ---------------------------------------------- This email (including any > attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may > contain confidential or privileged information and should not be read, > copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the named > recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from your system. > The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and > not > necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or > associated companies. > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the > recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged > information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other > person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and > delete the email from your system. The author's incumbent expressions, > views and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of > those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies. >
