Hi, Thank you for the info. The last thing I'm not sure about if I want to have a "new" console proxy than shall I use the new systemVM template or just replace the systemVM.iso file on the secondary storage?
Regards Tamas Monos DDI +44(0)2034687012 Chief Technical Office +44(0)2034687000 Veber: The Hosting Specialists Fax +44(0)871 522 7057 http://www.veber.co.uk Follow us on Twitter: www.twitter.com/veberhost Follow us on Facebook: www.facebook.com/veberhost -----Original Message----- From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: 27 November 2012 23:38 To: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org Cc: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: CloudStack 3.0.2 with 4.0 systemVM template? I don't believe there is a 4.0-specific system VM template. At least the current 4.0 instructions still say to download the acton template from feb 2012. On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Tamas Monos <tam...@veber.co.uk> wrote: > Hi, > > As I'm stuck with the 3.0.2->4.0 upgrade I've decided to drop 4.0 for > now and stay with 3.0.2 in production. > However the 4.0 console-proxy systemVM follows screen resolution > changes in 4.0 but not in 3.0.2 which is a major issue of ours. > > Can anyone tell me whether using a 4.0 systemVM template with a 3.0.2 > management server would resolve this issue? > Is it the systemVM.iso file needs replacing or the systemVM template? > > > Regards > > Tamas Monos DDI > +44(0)2034687012 > Chief Technical Office > +44(0)2034687000 > Veber: The Hosting Specialists Fax +44(0)871 522 > 7057 > http://www.veber.co.uk<http://www.veber.co.uk/> > > Follow us on Twitter: www.twitter.com/veberhost< > http://www.twitter.com/veberhost> Follow us on Facebook: > www.facebook.com/veberhost< http://www.facebook.com/veberhost> > >
