Jonathan, Thinking over the CloudStack as a whole, I'm not sure that would be such a good idea. Since secondary storage is shared across a zone, and you could have separate PODs for different hypervisors to create a mixture you wouldn't be able to utilize VMware template storage for XenServer, KVM, or OVM. It would become a product specific piece. If you want to have a single place of storage for the zone, or even share that across zones, you wouldn't want to rely solely on one hypervisor.
Just my 2 cents. Matt Mullins On 12/5/12 9:08 AM, "Jonathan Bastin" <jonathan.bas...@peerpointinternet.co.uk> wrote: >Is there any feature requests to use VMwares Template system rather than >cloudstack inbuilt one on the secondary storage? > > > >Regards, > > > > > >Jonathan Bastin > >Peer Point Internet Ltd > >Technical Architect > >Mob: 07739668262 > >-------------------------------------------------------------------------- >------------------------------------------------ This email (including >any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It >may contain confidential or privileged information and should not be >read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the >named recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from your >system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their >own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point >Internet Ltd or associated companies.
