Where shall I put this as it is getting rather large. Regards,
Jonathan Bastin ----- Reply message ----- From: "Vijayendra Bhamidipati" <vijayendra.bhamidip...@citrix.com> To: "cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org" <cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org> Subject: Server 2012 Date: Mon, Dec 10, 2012 20:53 Hi John! Well not yet, we actually bumped into this just late last week. Please do add this on the wish list that you plan to add :) Regards, Vijay -----Original Message----- From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 12:45 PM To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Server 2012 Is this happening on the dev list? I ask because I'm planning on adding a "wish list" to the wiki one of these days... On Dec 10, 2012, at 12:37 PM, Vijayendra Bhamidipati <vijayendra.bhamidip...@citrix.com> wrote: > Hi Jonathan, > > Feature scoping for the next release of cloudstack is going on, and this is > on the radar. I will let you know when the features are finalized. > > Regards, > Vijay > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jonathan Bastin [mailto:jonathan.bas...@peerpointinternet.co.uk] > Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 12:37 PM > To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Server 2012 > > Dam that is a kill joy. I have found it fine with 5.1 but nvm. Any idea when > this would be released. > > Regards, > > > Jonathan Bastin > > > ----- Reply message ----- > From: "Vijayendra Bhamidipati" <vijayendra.bhamidip...@citrix.com> > To: "cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org" > <cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org> > Subject: Server 2012 > Date: Mon, Dec 10, 2012 20:25 > > > > Hi Jonathan, > > Kirk is right. The VMWare api has changed between 4.0 and 5.1 and CS will > need to support the 5.1 vi api before it can deploy win 8/2012 instances on > esx. A simple db hack will not suffice. > > Regards, > Vijay > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kirk Kosinski [mailto:kirkkosin...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 12:15 PM > To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Server 2012 > > Hi, Jonathan. vSphere 5.1 isn't supported yet and I heard there are problems > with it so I don't suggest using it until it's supported. When support is > added, Server 2012 / Windows 8 should be added to the OS Types. I believe > adding an OS Type requires a code change and not a simple database hack. > > Best regards, > Kirk > > On 12/10/2012 10:22 AM, Jonathan Bastin wrote: >> Is there a way to hck some MySQL tables or something to list Server 2012 as >> Vmware 5.1 now supports it. >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> >> >> >> >> Jonathan Bastin >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the >> recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged >> information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other >> person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and >> delete the email from your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views >> and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of those of >> the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies. >> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) > named above. It may contain confidential or privileged information and should > not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the > named recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from your > system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own > and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or > associated companies. > Stratosec - Secure Infrastructure as a Service o: 415.315.9385 @johnlkinsella -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential or privileged information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not the named recipient please contact the sender and delete the email from your system. The author's incumbent expressions, views and thoughts are their own and not necessarily representative of those of the Peer Point Internet Ltd or associated companies.
