Guarantee is already available in terms of (storage/host/ha) tags. This is more of best effort. But these best effort parameters need to be spelt out to make it meaningful.
-abhi On 04/01/13 3:30 PM, "Mice Xia" <mice_...@tcloudcomputing.com> wrote: >Ewww. Sorry, Reply to the wrong loop previously... > >I'm also wondering if this is a guarantee or best-effort allocation (like >user- dispersing planner), if this is a guarantee case, should CS auto >migrate around VMs to ensure the newly created VM to be allocated on the >expected host which does not have sufficient capacity? > >-Mice > >-----Original Message----- >From: Mice Xia [mailto:mice_...@tcloudcomputing.com] >Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 5:43 PM >To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org >Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules > >iirc, Local Storage support was already per zone in 4.0, there is a >checkbox for enabling local storage when adding a new zone. >Guest domain prefix can also be specified in zone creation wizard. >And VR network throttling, is this specified in network offering? > >-Mice > >-----Original Message----- >From: Manan Shah [mailto:manan.s...@citrix.com] >Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 8:24 AM >To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org >Subject: [DISCUSS] Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules > >Hi, > >I would like to propose a new feature for enabling Affinity >/Anti-affinity rules in CS 4.1. I have created a JIRA ticket and provided >the requirements at the following location. Please provide feedback on >the requirements. > >JIRA Ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-739 >Requirements: >https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Affinity+-+Anti-aff >i >nity+rules > > >Regards, >Manan Shah > >
