On Jan 29, 2013, at 10:07 AM, Rohit Yadav <bhais...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:52 AM, Sebastien Goasguen <run...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> It seems to be breaking Charles jclouds scripts. >> >> Did you fix it in master after 4.0 release ? > > This was done in api refactoring branch which was merged recently and > it's in master only. > >> It could be that jclouds worked around this and that by fixing it, we >> actually broke the jclouds client. > > I don't know how jclouds works and handles response. I would like to > hear from jclouds and other folks who may have been affected and how > they can be helped. If we don't want this information, we can get rid > of it and it's just master, the fix is simple. Let's see what Charles has to say. He is preparing a demo for the BACD in Ghent. If you can send the hot fix via email, maybe Charles can apply it and rebuild to get things working. -Sebastien > > Regards. > >> -sebastien >> >>> >>> This information can be used by platforms that run on top of >>> CloudStack and clients/scripts to implement logic to handle response >>> based on version info. >>> >>> We can discuss and remove this field if we don't want it. >>> >>> Regards. >>> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Charles Moulliard >>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>
