ok, phew. Our convo did go private for an email or two. Lucian did have to make an effort to bring it back.
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Sebastien Goasguen <run...@gmail.com>wrote: > no we did not ! > > I like reading you guys having a chat, it's very instructive. > > thanks > > -sebastien > > On Feb 7, 2013, at 9:04 PM, Ahmad Emneina <aemne...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > boogers, i think everyone missed out on this convo because of the awesome > > new reply modifications. > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Ahmad Emneina <aemne...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> yes, exactly. > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote: > >> > >>> On 07.02.2013 19:13, Ahmad Emneina wrote: > >>> > >>>> i believe what you want to do is have 2 nics on the host. 1 for guest > >>>> traffic (public) and another for management traffic (private). Giving > a > >>>> hypervisor a public ip is not advisable. > >>>> > >>> > >>> So in this case, could I connect all hypervisors and management servers > >>> on their secondary interface and use some private range there? And when > >>> asked for reserved IPs at pod creation give out IPs from this range? > >>> > >>> > >>> Lucian > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > >>> > >>> Nux! > >>> www.nux.ro > >>> > >> > >> > >
