Since I only have one /24, I give the "CloudStack public IP's (the IP's cloudstack will nat and do whateve with)" 2-31.
I then create a shared network using the same vlan with the IP range set to 32-254. I pretty much only use that shared network for all my VM's. One day it would be nice if cloudstack would allow direct allocation of Public IP's. Would also be great if networks/systemvm combos could use templates so even the routing, nat, and other such networking stuff could be customized. As it stands now, If I want to build my own LB, Proxy, or network security Vm (think passthrough snort) I have to jump through many hoops. On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Ahmad Emneina <aemne...@gmail.com> wrote: > you can, using 'shared networks'. that'll just create a network with your > desired ip address space, caveat being, you'll need to do this using vlans. > > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Serge A. Salamanka <salsa-...@tut.by> > wrote: > > > Hello, Ahmad > > Grateful for your reply. > > I don't need NAT. With NAT gridftp protocol doesn't work. > > > > As I understand from your reply to assign Public IPs to VMs is possible > > under Basic network configuration. > > > > Can I do the same with Advanced network configuration ? > > > > #Serge > > > > On 06.03.2013 00:20, Ahmad Emneina wrote: > > > This is a fundamental use case in cloudstack. It can facilitate this > > > behavior either by directly assigning a public ip to a vm, or have the > vm > > > services exposed via NAT. > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Serge A. Salamanka <salsa-...@tut.by> > > wrote: > > > > > >> Hello, devs! > > >> could you please specify whether it is actually possible to create VMs > > >> with public IP-addresses on KVM hosts within the CloudStack? > > >> I need lot of services running on VMs that have public IPs. It is not > > >> clear from CloudStack documentation whether it is possible. At the > > >> moment I'm evaluating CloudStack to be used for managing grid-services > > >> of the National Grid Infrastructure. Need your help. > > >> > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> > > >> #Serge > > >> > > > > >
