Hello Kazi,

There is no need to be a root when running this benchmark.
Could you let me know the exact Memcached version you are using?

I guess you wanted to say "-S 30" in your command, rather than -S 3.

I see that you are using two servers at the same time.  I suggest you create 
two 
files: server1.txt and server2.txt each containing the corresponding server 
details.

Then run the following command to scale the dataset and warm up one server:
./loader -a ../twitter_dataset/twitter_dataset_unscaled -o 
../twitter_dataset/twitter_dataset_30x -s servers1.txt  -S 30 -D 4096 -j -T 1 

Once it finishes, you can just warm up the other server:
./loader -a ../twitter_dataset/twitter_dataset_30x -s servers2.txt -S 1 -D 4096 
-j -T 1 

Let me know what happens.

Regards,
Djordje
________________________________________
From: Kazi Sudipto Arif [[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 9:30 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: running data-caching magic number error

Hello,

I am attempting to get the data-caching benchmark up and running on Ubuntu 
10.04 OS (x86). I receive a magic number error when attempting to scale the 
dataset. The output file is not produced and I cannot start the benchmark. I 
cannot understand why this is happening and any help in tracking the cause 
would be much appreciated.

Scaling the dataset:

root@server:/opt/memcached/memcached_client# sudo ./loader -a 
../twitter_dataset/twitter_dataset_unscaled -o ../twitter_dataset_30x -s 
servers.txt -w 2 -S 3 -D 4096 -j -T 1
stats_time = 1
Configuration:

nProcessors on system: 8
nWorkers: 2
runtime: -1
Get fraction: 0.900000
Naggle's algorithm: False


host: 10.0.5.2
address: 10.0.5.2
host: 192.168.10.116
address: 192.168.10.116
Loading key value file...Average Size = 1057.34758
Keys to Preload = 802302
created uniform distribution 1000
rps -1 cpus 2
Overridge n_connections_total because < n_workers
num_worker_connections 1
num_worker_connections 1
Creating worker on tid 1340749568
starting receive base loop
On read Incorrect magic number: 48 should be: ffffff81

Thank you,

Kazi

Reply via email to