Ralph Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to A From: Ralph Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Aug 8, 2006 7:43 AM
On 8/8/06, ХȻ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But, the GC of Smalltalk is not realtime, it's a big problem for realtime > control. The GC of Squeak is not realtime, but people have made Smalltalks with realtime memory management. The original OTI Smalltalk, which morphed into IBM's VisualAge for Smalltalk, was real-time. When OTI reengineered it for IBM, one of the first things they did was write a faster, but non-realtime, garbage collector. See http://www.oovm.com/ for a commercial system that might see the light of day. I played with it a bit and it was pretty nice, though they changed the langauge to improve its performance on very small machines. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "clubSmalltalk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clubSmalltalk -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
