Actually, that's quite expected. Java Lucene developers are trying to accelerate performance by avoiding GC operations and creating new objects when possible, and that of course helps our C++ port to perform faster as well.
Unfortunately we currently don't have the time to perform benchmarks, not against previous versions and not against Java Lucene. We welcome any such info, and really hope to get more hands on deck. See http://clucene.sourceforge.net/contribute.shtml for possible ways you could get involved. Itamar. -----Original Message----- From: cel tix44 [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 3:40 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [CLucene-dev] Indexing performance 2.3.2 vs 0.9.21b Team When testing 2.3.2, I've noticed a significant increase in the indexing speed -- up to 7x -- as compared to 0.9.21b. Has anyone else seen this effect? -- if yes, shouldn't this be given more publicity? -- maybe, that'll encourage 9.21 users to give more help to development? Regards Celto ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ CLucene-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ CLucene-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers
