On 25/6/2010 3:58 PM, Kostka Bořivoj wrote: > I'm sorry, I missed there is different test which provokes this error n the > patch. (I mean different from > that one I ported). This together with fact the ported test will not > reproduce problem > caused my wrong conclusion. You are absolutely right. So we need to port the > original test > I guess, correct? > > Borek
Yes. I think this will be testWickedLongTerm which also exists in the 2.3.2 test suite (just make sure it is in sync with the changes in the patch). If that test provokes the exact same error you've encountered, all there'll be left to do is to port the core changes from that patch. Itamar. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ CLucene-developers mailing list CLucene-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers
