Thanks. I also suppose there is no such problem in the code, but I didn't
want to throw this away without discussing with somebody from CLucene team.

I'll continue testing cl_demo and try to find where are the leaks come from. 
and also check what's wrong with testWickedLongTerm().

Borek

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Itamar Syn-Hershko [mailto:ita...@code972.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 1:57 PM
> To: clucene-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [CLucene-dev] vector subscript outofrangeexceptionduringindexing
> 
> On 29/6/2010 1:41 PM, Kostka Bořivoj wrote:
> > I agree it works fine (and your way of nulling is definitelly better than 
> > mine).
> > I already indexed about 1GB of data, but I'm not sure about mem leaks,
> > as my application memory increases constantly during indexing (and it 
> > didn't with
> previous
> > version). But this could be of course bug in my app, or just becase the 
> > size of
> internal
> > "caches" increases or something else...
> >
> This is why I said using cl_demo and cl_test as a testbed to look for
> crashes and memory leaks is better.
> 
> This also depends on how you measure the memory usage for your
> application. Windows' Task manager isn't reliable for that.
> 
> > Before you mar thi solved, I'will try to explain, what I meant by duplicate 
> > pointers etc.
> In one of my previous mails,
> > just for case you find this important. If this is problem or not strongly 
> > depends on how
> postingsFreeListDW should be used.
> > If only items from 0 to postingsFreeCountDW are considered valid and the 
> > rest is
> just "junk" everything is OK.
> > But if postingsFreeListDW is supposed to be used beyond the
> postingsFreeCountDW (eg. for freeing postings objects during destruction), we 
> can
> run into the problems.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > The question is if
> >
> > (1) the tail always contains junk during destruction (and everything is OK, 
> > if yes) or
> >
> > (2) it can also contain valid pointers which should be deleted (so memory 
> > leaks are
> produced by tail nulling)
> >
> > Unfortunatelly until now I was not able figure out if (1) or (2) is true.
> >
> To correctly answer that, I need to profile the code which is something
> I cannot do at the moment. I am not the original author of the code -
> neither in its Java nor C++ shape. If you want to do this, use
> infoStream for easier tracking.
> 
> However, I think the way it operates is designed not to have such a
> scenario. Although Java won't suffer from double-deletions, that class
> was designed not to hold unused objects when they aren't needed - which
> is essentially what you are describing here.
> 
> The answer to your questions will be in the actual place where copying
> is performed. See DocumentsWriter::getPostings. I think the way copy
> operations are performed there prevents this from happening. Fact is on
> destruction all valid objects are in the head of the array, and the tail
> contains nothing important. That is at least from the use cases in
> cl_demo and cl_test.
> 
> The best way to either confirm or rule this is by thoroughly testing
> this - while both looking for crashes and mem-leaks in various scenarios
> (multi-threaded?).
> 
> If you wish, you could post such a question on Java Lucene's dev list.
> They're sure to answer this correctly, if they'll remember what they did
> there back in '07 or so :)
> 
> HTH
> 
> Itamar
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
> What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
> Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
> _______________________________________________
> CLucene-developers mailing list
> CLucene-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
CLucene-developers mailing list
CLucene-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers

Reply via email to