Hi, Index format and functionality are the same for both options, this is mainly a switch to allow adding CLucene also for projects using SBCS.
For every new development - with or without CLucene, especially such that handles texts extensively, I'd recommend using a MBCS (namely Unicode). Itamar. On 5/7/2010 12:32 PM, Liu bbskill wrote: > Hi,all > I used clucene to index and search multi-characters text. And I notice > that It works no matter I compiled clucene using --enable-ascii flags > (called ascii mode) or not (called default mode) 。 > The only difference is that if I used ascii mode, I must manually > transform the text to index or search to TCHAR char form. > > So I am curious about what is the inner difference between ascii mode > and default mode? > And what is the meaning of the existence of the default mode? for > performance or for portability? > > -- > JinBiao Liu > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint > What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? > Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first > > > _______________________________________________ > CLucene-developers mailing list > CLucene-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first _______________________________________________ CLucene-developers mailing list CLucene-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers
