Can i use the highlighter even if i don't store text in clucene index? Le samedi 07 août 2010 à 09:50 +0200, Ben van Klinken a écrit : > Check out the highlighter code in the contribs folder. Should do what u need. > > Ben > > On Saturday, August 7, 2010, <e...@telexis.com> wrote: > > Sorry if duplicate post, I wasn't subscribed when I did the 1st one, so not > > sure if it was aloud or blocked by spam filters. This is my first "post", > > so I hope I'm doing this correctly. I've only used Google Groups or > > on-line forums in the past, never email based lists. > > > > I'm using CLucene to index a custom ISAM legacy database of mine. The > > database holds emails and other messages. I've got the indexing working, > > and also the searching. However, our current (very slow) search method > > provides a "summary" for each search result. Basically fragments of the > > text around the words that were found. > > > > I have to read the records from my database for each result found by > > CLucene anyway, because I don't want to store all that data in Lucene, so I > > was thinking I would just scan my text manually to provide the same > > "summary" I'm currently providing. However, now I realize that isn't as > > simple as it was before, because I don't always know what words/phrases (I > > think Lucene calls them "terms") were found. For example, if the user does > > a fuzzy or wildcard search. Without recreating the CLucene logic, how can > > I do this? > > > > I understand that there are some additional libraries (maybe only for the > > Java version?) that do "highlighting", which is similar to what I want to > > do. I haven't found any source code for them yet, and even if I did, I'm > > not sure I could figure out how to extract that and recreate for my > > purposes (they may assume the text is stored in Lucene, or that I want the > > results in HTML format). My scenario seems to be unique, because I'm not > > working with a website, or indexing basic files. > > > > If I could find the section of code in CLucene where it "finds" results for > > my query, then I would know what words it found for each document. I'm not > > too worried about showing the "most relavent" fragments at this point, > > although that would be a nice feature down the road. > > > > p.s.-I'm loving CLucene so far, and if I can get past this last hurdle, I > > should be set =] > > > > -Eric Selk > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > This SF.net email is sponsored by > > > > Make an app they can't live without > > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev > > _______________________________________________ > > CLucene-developers mailing list > > CLucene-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by > > Make an app they can't live without > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > CLucene-developers mailing list > CLucene-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev _______________________________________________ CLucene-developers mailing list CLucene-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers
