> 2. I've been working on a new version of CLucene with Alan Wright. > This new version is called Lucene++, is compatible with Java Lucene > 3.0.3 and is heavily built with boost (full use of shared_ptr, and a > lot of other areas), and thus avoids many of the problems that users > have with memory handling and bugs relating to threading, etc. For a > number of reasons, I've decided not to try and merge the two projects. > For one, I think that CLucene still has a place (in fact I'm also > doing some work on CLucene - read below): namely for projects who > don't want or can't handle the overhead that Lucene++'s heavy use of > boost creates - such as on mobiles. > - see http://www.github.com/ustramooner/LucenePlusPlus > 1a. I've created python bindings around Lucene++ > - see http://www.github.com/ustramooner/python-lucenepp
For embedded then it make more sense than converting CLucene in a pure C engine, but i feel that there are not the resources to do it. For high performance computation it makes sense using boost. Great work! -- Quiero ser el rayo de sol que cada día te despierta para hacerte respirar y vivir en me. "Favola -Moda". ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar _______________________________________________ CLucene-developers mailing list CLucene-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers
