The Debian and YellowDog (and I think Connectivia) one would be easy, 
set your /etc/apt/sources.list to subscribe to the security updates, and 
have a cron job run nightly doing a 'apt-get update && apt-get upgrade' 
 ...that would keep you current.  But a presentation on the nuances of 
some of the other systems could be interesting.


Kevin Anderson a �crit:

>Apt-get works much different than Portage which works different than
>Mandrake Update Robot, which is different than YaST2, which is different
>than up2date, with the last even adding the possibility of a cost to the
>equation.  And hardest of all is manually checking the installed packages,
>and then visiting the appropriate sites to update them individually.
>
>It might be better to have a few people co-ordinate a presentation, with
>each demoing their favorite distro's tool/utility.
>
>Kev.
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Jarrod Major" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 10:37 AM
>Subject: Re: (clug-talk) Linux gets a worm!
>
>
>  
>
>>This sounds like an excellent topic for a presentation. Anyone want to
>>tackle it next month? We do not have a presentation scheduled and as such
>>    
>>
>it
>  
>
>>would be nice of someone came forward.
>>
>>Trevor, interested?
>>
>>Jarrod Major
>>CLUG Treasurer
>>Registered Linux User
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Trevor Lauder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 10:32 AM
>>Subject: Re: (clug-talk) Linux gets a worm!
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Even if you are running only services you want, those services still may
>>>require updating and monitoring.  If someone isn't keeping up on
>>>      
>>>
>updates,
>  
>
>>>etc and they get hacked because of it then they get what they deserve
>>>      
>>>
>and
>  
>
>>>I feel no sympathy for them.  Just because Linux/Netware are stable OSes
>>>doesn't mean they don't need babysitting (By this I mean: watching the
>>>logs, monitoring the network they are on).  The problem with the average
>>>NT/2000 or MCSE administrator is that Microsoft is promoting lazy/cheap
>>>administration.  A lot of those administrators that come over to linux
>>>bring those bad habits with them, and when something bad happens they
>>>blame it on the OS when the blame should in fact lie with themselves.
>>>Just my 2 cents.
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>One of the benefits of Linux is that it doesn't need to be babysat.
>>>>
>>>>I know this is an arguable thing, but I like that I set up a machine
>>>>        
>>>>
>at
>  
>
>>>>one of our remote locations, and it hasn't been signed into in well
>>>>        
>>>>
>over
>  
>
>>>>a year.
>>>>
>>>>It's fine to say "be on top of things", but I want a server that runs
>>>>like this...
>>>>        
>>>>
>http://www.networkcomputing.com/1119/1119f1products_2.html
>  
>
>>>>And I'll argue that exploit or not, this basically offers that
>>>>        
>>>>
>ability.
>  
>
>>>>Unlike NT, Linux and Netware both run only services that you want them
>>>>to, rather than needing repeated security patches for things like
>>>>        
>>>>
>MEDIA
>  
>
>>>>PLAYER on a server.
>>>>
>>>>I wonder if anyone would notice if I used a Database server for
>>>>        
>>>>
>watching
>  
>
>>>>DVDs throughout the day.  Maybe, but then they do have GL screensavers
>>>>too.
>>>>
>>>>Kev.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>>From: "Trevor Lauder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
>>>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 12:22 PM
>>>>Subject: Re: (clug-talk) Linux gets a worm!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>>>Actually, worms under linux have existed for a while now... and even
>>>>>longer under unix.  As for this exploit, I really hope anyone here
>>>>>running SSL had that patched a while ago because the patch for that
>>>>>exploit came out about a month ago.  This exploit is targeting
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>servers
>  
>
>>>>>that haven't been updated in a at least a month and it's actually
>>>>>hitting lots of people, pretty sad when patches have been available
>>>>>for a while now.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>>>Hash: SHA1
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Finally Linux is worth the time for someone to make a worm. Easy to
>>>>>>            
>>>>>>
>>>>>detect,  easy to defeat, and dose not affect my server but still a
>>>>>worm.
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>>>            
>>>>>>
>http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/security/Content/2002.09.13.ht
>  
>
>>>>ml
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>>>>Yes I run Apache but I don't use SSL. If you run SSL you must read
>>>>>>            
>>>>>>
>>>>>this. - --
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>>>Roy Souther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>>http://www.SiliconTao.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Live to code, code to live!
>>>>>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>>>>Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
>>>>>>Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>iEYEARECAAYFAj2F83YACgkQCbnxcmEBt434oACgqPHbAWIcOBX6m7jOUZ2rsLJR
>>>>>>            
>>>>>>
>>>>>1YoAnRkdLTB42p8mS+WlaDuB5L7nV39+
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>>>=YkE6
>>>>>>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>>>>            
>>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>
>>    
>>



Reply via email to