It's not as bad as I say, it's worse.

Whatever, I did it ugly cause I just needed it to work.  I'll spend a bit,
and add a few comments, and fix a few things (Like looking up the rename
stuff), and send it in.

Kev.



----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Clement" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 4:46 PM
Subject: Re: (clug-talk) Well, Postgres it is.


> Even if the code needs some work (and I'm sure it's not as bad as you
say),
> I'm certain other people would find it useful.  One of my friends clients
> was migrating away from SQL Server and hit similar problems.  Some scripts
> that helped out even if they needed "help".  Who knows, it might spur
> someone else into fixing it and converting it into a more general tool.
>
> Jeff
>
> --On Thursday, November 21, 2002 4:25 PM -0700 Kevin Anderson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > So my script worked, except where MS SQL wanted a default of 'E' for a
> > Float8 column.  There were actually 3 columns I needed to do manually, 2
> > putting character values into numeric fields, and one when confused
about
> > a timezone issue. (The vendor is getting back to me on that one).
> > Purdy successful, all in all.
> >
> > So here's my question.
> >
> > The utility I wrote was useful for me.  It's ugly beyond words, and it's
> > undoubtedly filled with errors, never mind having things that could just
> > be done better.  (For example, I forget how to rename a file, so I use a
> > NASTY workaround.  I open the bad filename for input, and the good
> > filename for output, and the just input from one, and write into the
> > other until it's done.)  I have NEVER claimed to be a coder, and fear
> > not, I'll stay the hell away from the kernel.
> > So what do I do with this piece of useful junk I created?  Should I send
> > it to the Postgres guys for them to laugh at?  Or hang my head in shame,
> > and pretend it never existed.  I'm certainly not putting my name on it,
> > but there is the possibility that someone else might find a use for it.
> >
> > Kev.
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to