Again, you can not compair a windows 2000 install to a Gentoo install. 
Think about your logic here.

> Sure, but if I want that Gentoo box to have a GUI (I don't, but lets
> compare apples to apples), My post install includes 4 hours of compiling
> various KDE pieces.  Then configuring, etc.
>
> The Windows post install is done just as fast as downloading and
> installing an Nvidia driver for Linux. Or fixing the fonts.
>
> Maybe thats because I generally don't have a GUI on my Linux boxes, and
> therefore have little experience with doing either of these things.  But
> I do know my way around Linux quite well, and it would still take me a
> while to have a Linux box that compares to a legacy OS.
>
> Kev
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Trevor Lauder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 1:33 AM
> Subject: Re: Re: (clug-talk) Linux Work
>
>
>> Yep, post install of windows 2000 takes *a lot* longer then the
>> install itself.  To have a proper install you need to download the
>> correct drivers for the NIC, Video Card, Sound Card and Motherboard
>> INF file.  Sure you could run it with what Microsoft says in their
>> infinite wisdom it should be using but that is just plain silly and
>> suicidal.  A lot of problems on a windows box that you have a hard
>> time figuring out or explaining can be solved by using the latest
>> driver from the manufacturer... not from Microsoft.  And if it's a
>> server then you definatly should not be using the default drivers for
>> things like the NIC.  They are software people, they know jack squat
>> about hardware, especially hardware someone else manufactured.  Then
>> you have service pack 3 (windows 2000) and service pack 1 (windows
>> xp), reboot after that.  DirectX, and reboot.  Internet Explorer, and
>> reboot.  Whatever other updates are left, some may require separate
>> downloads, installs and reboots before you can continue with the rest
>> of them.  The only reason you need to reboot a Linux box after an
>> update is if you upgrade the kernel.
>>
>> > On Sun, 2002-12-01 at 19:33, Kevin Anderson wrote:
>> >> Gentoo took me almost 4 hours to compile (stage 1, 2, and 3), on a
>> Xeon 700smp box.
>> >
>> > Just remember that Gentoo takes longer to install than a binary
>> distro.
>> >
>> >> Starting from nothing (Gentoo/Debian) and adding packages takes a
>> long time. Likewise,
>> >> Starting with more crap than I need (Red Hat/etc Put Windows in
>> this category) and deleting it after the fact (Plus upgrading out
>> of date packages, and patching) takes just as long as Windows.
>> >
>> > Upgrading packages in Linux always takes less time that in Windows.
>> Whether it's apt, up2date, urpmi, or YOU it is just a matter of
>> telling it to upgrade and off it goes, d/ls all the packages and
>> installs them. It took me 3 hours to upgrade a Win 98 box since I
>> had to reboot after every upgrade, and once the system came back up
>> there would be an upgrade for the upgrade I just installed. That
>> alone is reason enough for me not to want to use Windows.
>> >
>> >> Windows 2000 reboots exactly once during the install process.  Same
>> as Linux
>> >
>> > As I said above it's post install that is the killer.
>> >
>> >> I'm not done with a server for at least a day, regardless of the
>> OS. Maybe I'm slow.  I dunno.  But I do find Windows faster.
>> Setting up Printers is easier with Windows (What's the IP address,
>> OK, Done) is easier than with Linux (Configure
>> CUPS/LPR/LPRNG/Whatever, Configure Samba, Set up Samba to autoDL
>> drivers)
>> >
>> > I don't have any problems with printers. Modern versions of Red
>> Hat/Mandrake/SuSE always seem to detect and configure my printers at
>> home and at work. Samba on the other hand can be a bitch, but once
>> you have it setup for your network you can just copy the config.
>> file to any new installs and it will work fine. Mandrake is pretty
>> good about setting up a simple samba server. You just tell it to let
>> users share files, and with the GUI any user can share a folder in
>> their home dir. just as easily as in Windows.
>> >
>> > Jesse



Reply via email to