Is there a 'typo' on the name "mail.teluplanet.com "? Shouldn't it be
mail.telusplanet.com - Did they make a mistake when at registration of their
domain or - could anyone explain the implications of this on the whole
picture of the internet?

I know that at one time they were using non-routeable ip addresses out there
on the internet on at least one of their servers ie. 192.168.x.x - I just
did a traceroute and did not find any indication of this anymore. I wonder
if they fixed it or I just did not see it this time.


Thanks Guys!



J.Rafael.Sánchez
Systems Administrator
Itres Research Limited
www.itres.com
P.403.250.9944
F.403.250.9916

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bogi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:31 AM
Subject: Re: (clug-talk) hot links work in kmail


> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I think i found what you are looking for ...
> This is how you could find out about it
> (mx is the mail xchange record in the dns )
> and unfortionatly it seems telus seems to have their incoming and outgoing
> e-mail servers in different tld-s
> I will not try to explain it :-)
>
> dig teluplanet.com mx
>
> ; <<>> DiG 9.2.1 <<>> teluplanet.com mx
> ;; global options:  printcmd
> ;; Got answer:
> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 59777
> ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 3
>
> ;; QUESTION SECTION:
> ;teluplanet.com.                        IN      MX
>
> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> teluplanet.com.         86400   IN      MX      10 mail.teluplanet.com.
>
> ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
> teluplanet.com.         172780  IN      NS      NS1.HIGHHOSTING.NET.
> teluplanet.com.         172780  IN      NS      NS2.HIGHHOSTING.NET.
>
> ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
> mail.teluplanet.com.    86400   IN      A       65.192.28.32
> NS1.HIGHHOSTING.NET.    172800  IN      A       65.192.28.20
> NS2.HIGHHOSTING.NET.    172800  IN      A       65.192.28.21
>
>
> So there it is mail.teluplanet.com is your incoming mail server .. The
smtp
> server that is :-)
>
> Cheers
> Szemir
>
>
> On Thursday 09 January 2003 01:30, you wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I just proved to myself that hot links work in kmail.
> >
> > Thank you so much, Aaron , for your help in gettint kmail working.
> >
> > Thank you Sam Bogi for helping me get my computer to Cameron's car.
> >
> > Thank you Cameron Nikitiuk for driving me to the meeting. Without
bringing
> > my computer to the meeting I would not have gotten kmail working
> >
> > And thanks for the tip on the book I want to get at Nexus.
> >
> > I really love kmail
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Michael Walters
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
>
> iD8DBQE+HTNNsv2SdkgY6dURAilpAJ40wC6NPyCqsYab8puv8dC/4zXoRACfaekQ
> bY3eXXrpIiO3Bic6cltYjcU=
> =AMg8
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to