-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 23 January 2003 03:07, Dave Lee wrote:
> Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > still hard to beat "15dd:120P" for speed though.
>
> s/15dd:120P/C-u 15 C-k M-g 120/
>
> if you count control and alt sequences as two keys pressed,
> vim wins 9 to 11, if they're only 1 key than emacs wins 8 to 9.
to be fair, the ':' requires a shift press, so vim only wins 10 to 11.
but: do you hit a single key or a key combo faster? =) if you start measuring
things like key locality and movement coordination, vim really starts coming
out on top speedwise IME.
emacs is still better than most of the crap editors out there though =))
- --
Aaron J. Seigo
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler"
- Albert Einstein
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+MGp81rcusafx20MRAqZ7AJwIFIJzhjh5+AacfgWYcLh1YJ0MFACfY6Ec
oCsa38UGWrwnoL1gFuWJO4g=
=Cja5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
