Ok, I've followed the discussion, and reviewed the links that were posted in
response to my original question, and I'm still not clear which FS would be
the "right" choice in my case.

As near as I can tell, Reiser handles small files well.  XFS apparently does
an adequate job of small to medium sized files, but really excels at large
files.  What exactly constitutes a "medium" file?  I'd assume a file size of
a few bytes or kilobytes would be small, and 100 MB would be large.  But
would a 3 MB file be considered large? Medium?  Small?

For my purposes, I'm looking for the "right" (if there is any single correct
answer) file system for a server running Apache, Postfix, and Samba, and
possibly FTP (though I don't think that figures into the decision much).
Most of the web pages would be very small , but I may choose to store my MP3
collection there and maybe access it via the Internet, or place some high
resolution/dpi images on my pages.  In this case, would Reiser be the better
solution because it handles small files better, and suffer, if needed, when
accessing larger files?  Or would XFS be the better choice because it is
adequate with small files, and best for large files?

The articles I've read are a bit out of date, so I'm not sure if my
conclusions are valid.  Have the performance and upper limits of the file
systems changed?  (XFS can hold more overall, and the largest file size it
can create is better than Reiser).

Currently, I'm leaning towards Reiser because it looks as though it has a
wider user base (aka more community support).  And it'll likely meet my
meager needs.

Comments are welcomed.  And thanks for the entertaining, and educational
discussions....

Shawn

Reply via email to