Thanks for the suggestions, Chris. I am still finding out where
everything goes. And i am still building the system so not sure what to
keep and what to lose. In /usr/portage/distfiles are a handful of non
compressed files -- 

bash205b-002  bash205b-003  bash205b-004  cvs-src (an empty directory) 
readline43-001 readline43-002  rsync-2.5.6-proxy-auth-1.patch

Can i lose these as well?

--
Keith

On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 02:52:36AM -0600, Chris Lobkowicz wrote:
> Just remember to delete /usr/portage/distfiles if you have disk constraints.
> When your system is built, you can safely delete all those source tarballs
> and live rather happy. Also there is an emerge flag to clean up after
> install, cant remember it offhand though.
> A fresh install will use quite nearly a gig or more of source files in
> /usr/portage/distfiles , all depending on your use flags. All that can be
> deleted, as you likely wont need the source to gcc or glibc for compiling a
> itty bitty app. Also, /var/db/pkg/* could be deleted, but you may wanna dive
> the forums of gentoo to make sure, as that is all the ebuild config files,
> though small, it's a lot of stuff when you have kde, X, apps, base system.
> 
> I have a (somewhat) functional server on a dual p90 with 1gig and a 3gig
> disk. /boot & / are on the 1giger, and /usr and swap are on the 3. And I
> have lots of room to spare for general stuff, not a whole lot of /home space
> avail, but since its just a dhcp, dns, smp/openmosix cluster. Not much is
> needed.
> 
> Gentoo = happy
> Gentoo = lots of install time, it isn't just a couple of cd's worth of
> packages. Its your personal time to type stuff in, then let the processor do
> the rest of the work. And for the total of 7.65 minutes of typing, there is
> anywhere from 3-40+ hours of compile time, so really it could be considered
> an "un-attended install". Sorta...
> 
> Gentoo rocks, and the only distro to come close from a "it just works the
> first time". Other than Mandrake 8.1 or RedHat 8.x
> 
> Have fun with Gentoo, and perhaps it could be a presentation topic for a
> future meeting? (If I can ever get to one, or borrow a decently fast laptop
> to showcase an install)
> 
> Cheers
> Chris
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keith Robinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 22:55
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: (clug-talk) Gentoo 1.4 -- taking the plunge
> 
> 
> 
> I've been running Mandrake since 7.1 as my primary home workstation. As i've
> written here before I've become increasingly frustrated by the RPM system.
> It locks me into apps and configs I don't want. So, increasingly I install a
> bad mix of precompiled RPMs, source RPMs and source files. Obviously I am
> looking for trouble on a system that must be trouble free.
> 
> So, recently I fried my glibc and everything I tried with rpm caused seg
> faults. So in a fit of stoopidity then deleted the contents of /var/lib/rpm.
> For those of you who use any RPM based distro, don't delete the contents of
> /var/lib/rpm. 
> 
> Look:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] rpm]# rpm -qa
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] rpm]#
> 
> Yeehaw. Can not install or upgrade any rpm package cause the system thinks
> none are installed so all dependencies are unmet.
> 
> so, when I saw the note on this group that gentoo 1.4 was ready for my
> taking I thought I'd give it a try on a different machine -- an HP 
> Netserver LC3, dual PIII450 with 4 4.3 Gb SCSI drives. This is also my 
> first experience in working with a dual CPU machine or with SCSI.
> 
> It is now my 4th day with Gentoo. I have never had so much fun. Everything
> about it makes sense, respects the user and gives the user the tools and the
> info what we need. 
> 
> I suspect in due time i will switching my main machine to Gentoo. 
> 
> One thing though -- Gentoo is a huge disk hog. I've spent a lot of time
> sizing partitions and sym linking directories to allow for how much 
> storage it requires. 
> 
> As in most things Linux i consider myself a complete newbie. if I can get
> this stuff to work most anyone can. It just requires a lot of work and time.
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> --
> Keith Robinson

Reply via email to