Scotty: Aye Captain.  This approach might cause some confusion among the
spammers, but all those messages will eventually overload our system.  I
can't keep it running much longer Captain.

-----Original Message-----
From: Nick W [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2003 11:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: (clug-talk) OT :: Scotch addled anti-Spam fantasies


Bones: It'll never work, Jim. Most spam comes from spoofed, non-existent
email
addresses. They aren't looking to have people reply by email, they just want
you to click the link to thier website and buy your viagra/penis/breast
enlargement combo kit....



On October 4, 2003 03:00 am, Marcel Lecker wrote:
> Stardate 200310140149, Captain's log
>
> Science officer Spock has just determined that our present rate of
> attack from the spammers will render our ship useless within days. We've
> found a possible deffence .... turning the spammers against
> themselves...
> -------
>
> Kirk: Has any one implamented a script which generates a generic reply
> of interest based on addresses harvested from a dynamically filtered set
> of spam messages? If so I'd be delighted to know more.
>
> Spock: Perhaps it is a neive assumption about humans captain, but
> spammers do want to have replies (like the one in tenthousand people who
> want to help some Nigerian out of his financial predicament).
>
> Kirk: we're swimming in *#$@ here Spock! we need answers!
>
> Spock: If one were to reply _as_ another email address,..like a reply-to
> on a piece of spam it could really make a spammer work for those
> returns. The more spam you get the better it works. The more spam
> everyone gets (who is using the script that is)... the better it works.
>
> Kirk: So the bigger the set of spam addresses, the better the returns?
> If your spam folder is 50 deep, each of those 50 would appear to mail
> each other (but not it self). what would that do to the evil spammers
> who are attacking us?
>
> Spock: If 200 people each got 50 peices of spam within an arbitrary
> time-frame and were the script Mr. Scott is working on -which uses the
> reply-to field in each- to reply to all but itself (50!-48!), each
> spammer would recieve (50!-48!)*200 = 9800 messages of interest.
>
> Kirk: It's like an anti-spam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Spock: yes indeed captain. I believe humans have a term called poetic
> justice for this sort of thing.
>
> ----------------
>
> ...demonic (scotch addled) laugh...
>
> On a side note, what started this thinking is ...it would be kind of fun
> to have it seem like people wanting a bigger member looking to help
> Nigerians with financial predicaments who in turn are looking for better
> deals on ... you get the idea.
>
> http://theregister.co.uk/content/archive/28525.html
> http://theregister.co.uk/content/archive/23629.html
>
>
> damn! ... I wish I knew Perl.
>
> Marcel

--
Nick W ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Registered Linux User #324288 (http://counter.li.org)
MSN Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo: foolish_gambit
ICQ: 303276221

Reply via email to